|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is a real simple but fairly accurate homeowner run time calculator.... it's basic but it will give you a starting point
http://www.rainbird.com/support/runtimecalculator |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
FYI Fimco ... That pic depicts seasonal root growth trend for a cool season turf, not root depth.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry guys I have been busy and did not have time to reply. What is the best way to go about figuring out my replenishment rate? Thanks.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.turf-digital.com/Jul2011/...eSet=12&page=0 |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
So I went out and ran a test - you guys tell me what you think. Again my well is 225' deep and when drilled was logged as a 20 gpm well. I pulled the cover off the top of my well and stuck a 30' tape down it while looking with a flashlight and at exactly 20' from the top of my well casing the tape toughed the water. I ran one zone manually for 30 minutes. Zone 2 which is in the most sun during the day. I figure WTF may as well water that area while I am experimenting. After the 30 minute run was up and I stuck the 30' tape down in it again and obviously I could not touch water in the 30'. I waited 30 minutes and measured again. The 30' tape touched water at 22.6' so in that 30 minutes the well recovered back almost where it started minus 2.6' which is about 15 gallons of water. 6 inch well casing so .25'^2 * 3.14(pie) * 2.6' = 2.04 cu. ft. 7.48 gallons per cubic feet so about 15 gallons. Being I watered for 30 minutes with four 1.6 gpm heads I figure I used 192 gallons of water and recovered back 177 in 30 minutes if my thinking is right. So if it recovered 177 gallons in 30 minutes it recovered at about 6 gpm in reality. What do you guys think? Is that right?
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I didn't read the thread thoroughly enough to answer anything else but, 1/4" in 30 minutes for a rotor zone is right on the money. We estimate them at 1/2" an hour until we do an audit and find out otherwise. In a good design, they're usually pretty close to that.
The right way to get your PR and DU is to set up straight walled containers of equal size in a grid throughout the zone. After that, there's some math involved to calculate your precipitation rate (you basically average them out) and the distribution uniformity (which is the more important number at first). I can't remember the formula for calculating DU and I'm too lazy to look it up right now. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
















Linear Mode
