|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
-platinum |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
The way i read it Rainbird says the rotators match up with their MPR nozzle sets not their standard set. You could make them match some of the standard tree nozzles if you wanted but not all.
http://www.rainbird.com/landscape/pr...mprNozzles.htm |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The point here is to get a precipitation rate that is appropriate for the bed. I seriously doubt a 0.16 GPM nozzle is going to cut it on a rotor zone. You need to check the outputs of your rotor nozzles before you can even begin to get an idea of an appropriate nozzle. Ideally you would want to calculate/audit your rotor zones PR, then calculate an appropriate PR for the bed based on plants and available nozzles. While it is unlikely you will get it exact, you might be able to get something close. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In general, you can figure rotors to be around 1/2 in/hr and sprays to be around 1.5 in/hr. This isn't always the case but it is a good starting point that covers most installations. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
-platinum |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
-platinum |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
No. Nozzle output does not correlate to PR without reference to area.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|

















Linear Mode
