Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2002, 10:41 PM
Albemarle Lawn Albemarle Lawn is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VIRGINIA
Posts: 1,546
New Chevy/GMC C4500 Kodiak med-duty

This is a really nice new truck. Sat in one today with the Duramax. 16,000 GVW should be great for a Millenium enclosed landscape body or an open landscape body.

Here's a link:

The motor is partially in a doghouse. It's snub-nosed but more nose than a van. GM claims a tighter turning radius than a midsize car.

Thinking of buying one to replace the Mitsubishi-Fuso below, although it would break my heart, the Mitsu is just a baby with 17K original miles.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Albemarle Lawn; 08-10-2002 at 10:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2002, 12:02 AM
Gravel Rat Gravel Rat is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 9,544
Personally I wouldn't buy one of those new 4500s the cab is way to large for getting into tight spaces with it actually I would buy a 550 instead. If I was going to spec a landscape truck it would be a T-300 Kenworth with a low side box or a dumping flatdeck atleast with this truck you could carry a load.

Just my personal opinion is if the truck doesn't say Ford or Kenworth on it I won't buy it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2002, 09:59 AM
cat320 cat320 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: eastern,Ma
Posts: 820
you left out mack .they are one hell of a truck
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2002, 10:45 PM
Albemarle Lawn Albemarle Lawn is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VIRGINIA
Posts: 1,546
Actually, the cab is SMALLER (shorter from front bumper to back of cab) than F550

And, GM claims the turning radius is LESS THAN THE AVERAGE MIDSIZE CAR!!!

Guys I parked my Mitsubishi-Fuso next to one of these and the cab is not that much longer, plus cab to rear axle offers more usable space because the engine is not under the cab like the Mitsubishi or Chevy/Isuzu W4500 Cabover.

The minimum gross is 16,000 which is comparable to the Mitsubishi or Isuzu's 14,500 gross.

Here is a link...this is a NEW NEW 2003 model, click on it you probably haven't seen this beauty yet.

AND a 4X4 is supposed to be offered starting in January.


http://www.gmfleet.com/us/images/200...odiakC4500.jpg

KB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2002, 11:28 PM
Gravel Rat Gravel Rat is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 9,544
No offence or Chevy bashing but I looked at the attached photo and it looks like they cut and pasted in the trailer with the mini on it. You look at the truck and you can tell it was moving when the picture was taken by the blurryness on the wheels but look at the trailers wheels they are at a dead stop.

I would probably wait a year before considering buying one of these new ugly looking trucks by that time the bugs might be worked out or Chevy will scrap the idea of these trucks. If they are trying to aim these for Work/Personal use trucks its not gonna work not like F-450 and F-550 where you can use these trucks for a daily driver if you choose todo so and they look like a P/U truck from a distance. You could spot that chevy from a mile away it sticks out like a sore thumb a real DOT attractor better watch out for being overloaded.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2002, 10:19 AM
4 Saisons 4 Saisons is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sherbrooke, Quebec (French province of the canada)
Posts: 216
about the pic, the jack on the trailer is also on the lower positition.
__________________
Denis

Stripes America in Eric Memories.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2002, 09:19 PM
thelawnguy thelawnguy is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Central CT
Posts: 2,412
What you see is the mudflaps...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2002, 12:42 AM
Brickman's Avatar
Brickman Brickman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: eastern WY
Posts: 1,249
I would have to agree with Ford, KW, or Mack.

The F 550 is rated at 26K lbs gross. A lot more than the 16K lbs for the 4500.
My F 250 is rated at 20K and I have had 29 and 30K lbs plenty of times.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2002, 01:48 PM
Albemarle Lawn Albemarle Lawn is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VIRGINIA
Posts: 1,546
f250 20,000?

That would be the GCVW, Gross Combined Vehicle Weight, meaning truck and trailer.

Try to put 16K on your F250 without a trailer. You would have to pour the bed full of lead to get that much weight on given the space of a pickup. And if you did, you might be able to putt around a parking lot a few laps before the truck died.

Yes I like Mack and KW. But I'm talking about just enough truck to haul 3 ZTR mowers or a bobcat, etc. ON THE TRUCK not on a trailer behind it.

Here we have a lot of cramped properties where a trailer is a real PITA so what I'm getting at is eliminating the trailer.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2002, 02:25 PM
Brickman's Avatar
Brickman Brickman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: eastern WY
Posts: 1,249
16K lbs in the bed would be extreme. The motor wouldn't die the suspension would give out. Shoot I have had 30K lbs. gross plenty of times and the PS will drag that just fine.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Page generated in 0.10933 seconds with 8 queries