Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-17-2010, 06:22 AM
Shadetree Ltd's Avatar
Shadetree Ltd Shadetree Ltd is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Surrey, British Columbia
Posts: 390
You could also call this skinny snow tires vs wide snow tires, everybody knows that the skinny tires are better for traction in the snow (588 square inches for the Tak and 885 square inches for the asv) It does show that the tracks on the Tak are much better in the snow than the oem though.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-17-2010, 08:24 AM
swanny swanny is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: mt. airy maryland
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadetree Ltd View Post
You could also call this skinny snow tires vs wide snow tires, everybody knows that the skinny tires are better for traction in the snow (588 square inches for the Tak and 885 square inches for the asv) It does show that the tracks on the Tak are much better in the snow than the oem though.
Most likely true. The Next Gen track also has skinnier tread bars (some are wider, some are narrower) ...probably helps the bite.

I'll try it on different ground situations and post it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-17-2010, 09:29 AM
KTM KTM is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 468
I am a Tak man, and even I would have thought the ASV would have had it on snow. I bet my TL140 would not push the 60 with standard tracks in those conditions. The tracks must work great. I wonder if they hold up as good as standard?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-17-2010, 09:39 AM
4 seasons lawn&land's Avatar
4 seasons lawn&land 4 seasons lawn&land is online now
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 3,199
Ive ran a 120 a couple times and a mustang which I believe is the same thing and the controls of those machines made other machines controls seem like alot of work. But the only other SS Ive ran with pilot controls was a T320 which is way bigger so maybe that was why but the contols were pretty bad compared to what I was used to. Just slow, unresponsive, made me want to keep throtling up but it was all the way up!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-20-2011, 02:48 PM
landscapebuilders landscapebuilders is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 13
ASV's ride very smooth, but the problem I've seen is with the rubber drive lugs on the tracks peeling right off the track. CAT used to use this system and have since moved away and went back to a gear drive system. I'd go with Takeuchi.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-20-2011, 04:01 PM
bobcat_ron's Avatar
bobcat_ron bobcat_ron is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia
Posts: 9,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by landscapebuilders View Post
ASV's ride very smooth, but the problem I've seen is with the rubber drive lugs on the tracks peeling right off the track. CAT used to use this system and have since moved away and went back to a gear drive system. I'd go with Takeuchi.
Bair makes a really good replacement lug, I used them and even made a video of it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwPCrDb--rI
__________________
“The only difference between a pigeon and a farmer today
is that a pigeon can still make a deposit on a John Deere.” - Harry De Jong



http://www.youtube.com/user/69rd96
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-20-2011, 04:45 PM
landscapebuilders landscapebuilders is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobcat_ron View Post
Bair makes a really good replacement lug, I used them and even made a video of it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwPCrDb--rI
Oh wow that's very interesting. Thanks for the information! I'll let my buddy know about this.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:16 PM
tnmtn's Avatar
tnmtn tnmtn is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE Tn.
Posts: 988
i think it's all about psi on the ground. the asv is lighter on its feet despite being the heavier machine and gives the advantage to the tak. when i was buying my B300 the dealer got in a s300 bobcat and i was in the B300 and we pushed against eachother. i could push him all over the parking lot despite not having near the Hp from the engine. my machine outweighed the s300 by around 500#.
__________________
'78 Chevy C65 Dump
'94 F-350 7.3 IDI
Bobcat B300
Root Grapple
Box Blade
12" & 24" backhoe buckets
TT300E
Dingo TX425
GRI
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-20-2011, 07:07 PM
StihlBR600's Avatar
StihlBR600 StihlBR600 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: White Lake, MI
Posts: 705
Wow i was actually surprised. I thought the asv would have had more traction. Put the Tak 120 up against the ASV SR 80. Or the TL250 which ever one is the closest weight to the SR80
__________________


2007 F-250 4x4 V10
8' Western Pro Plus Plow
2010 Haul-It tandem 6.5x14 aluminum trailer
2012 7X16 Enclosed Trailer
7X10 Dump Trailer
18 HP Billy Goat Leaf Loader
2012 SCAG Cheetah 61" 32 HP Vanguard
Accelerator grass catcher with leaf entender
Kawasaki 24" KHT600 hedge trimmers
Stihl FS 90R Trimmer with edger
Two Stihl FS 100 RX Trimmers
Stihl BG 55 blower
Two Stihl BR 600 Magnum backpack blowers
Stihl MS 180C Chainsaw
8 HP Giant Vac blower

21 Years Old
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-21-2011, 06:03 PM
Ausman Ausman is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 262
how does this happen then?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjYT8...eature=related
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.com™ - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Page generated in 0.09789 seconds with 7 queries