Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-27-2011, 05:42 PM
HayBay's Avatar
HayBay HayBay is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 825
Not trying to get in the way here. I have my own lynching going on in another thread.

I appreciate the link and I will be watching for the revised verison of this study to understand better.


Quote: "I'm pulling it only because the paper that's going to replace it is even stronger," Payne said, referring to a new study that is expected this year. "I am trying to show our critics that I'm listening to them."

Updated:

http://fyn.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/SS49600.pdf
Just found the link

Last edited by HayBay; 01-27-2011 at 05:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-27-2011, 06:25 PM
HayBay's Avatar
HayBay HayBay is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 825
Found this topic here too, same link to Florida Website

http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=295298
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-27-2011, 07:03 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric Ric is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: S W Florida
Posts: 11,365
Haybay

Thank You,

I want to say if any one is not living and working in Florida then maybe they should stay out of the Florida Forum. However I welcome your input. I was spraying today and what posting I did was from my Truck.

This is the link to the recommendation currently before Florida Legislation that I was referring to. It has not been pulled off publication in any way as Kiril might try and have us believe. I believe if you study the whole thing you will find it is a very reasonable law that while it does make me change some of my applications, I can live with. What Makes a good law is how well it is accepted by the public and this law is very acceptable as compared to the Black Out laws passed locally by those with less understanding and Liberal views. These Black out laws are being broken every day and can not be enforced.

http://consensus.fsu.edu/Fertilizer-...rce/index.html

Here is the other Link I was referring to about the consequences of Fertilizer Black out. Once again it is still being Published and our California Whiz might have you believe it is not.

http://fyn.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/SS49600.pdf


Lawnsite was started with the intentions to share information the same as any team might work together. That means we should be ready to get our fellow members rebound and sink the shot together. Not sit on the side lines and roll marbles across the Playing field. I only hope those who are being attacked in several thread right now learn to Play ball.
__________________
.

"TG doesn't give a rats ass about being "Responsible" as long as sales/production quotas are met. That's it in a nutshell. A recipe for disaster IMO." Ted Putnam 2/28/14

You can lead a Donkey to water but you can't make the Jackass Drink

"As Americans you have the right to be stupid." John Kerry

"Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.” John Wayne.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-27-2011, 08:59 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
First you have no Idea what Study I am talking about and to my Knowledge that study is sitting in limbo waiting for our Elected officials to vote on a state wide Fertilizer law to be effective January of 2014 and will over ride any present county or city ordinances.
Actually Ric, I do. You have referenced that "study" time and time again. If that isn't the study, by all means let everyone know which one it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
But this is typical of all your posts that look to make the thread starter look like a dummy.
I beg to differ. Pointing out inaccurate information is not "making people look like dummies"...... they did that all by themselves. If you don't want people to correct you, make sure your information is accurate. Pretty damn simple isn't it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
Sure I pound a few people who I know are either applying illegal or are so egotistical that they can only brag how good they are. HOWEVER I ALSO START THREADS TRYING MY BEST TO HELP PEOPLE BY USING LAYMAN TERMS AND CUTTING TO THE CHASE.You on the other hand knock those attempts and get the thread deleted. The last Thread you got deleted, You could find nothing to correct so you attacked me on the fact I had no University Website to back it up.
Actually Ric ... you were the one who begged the mods to close the thread, not me. Furthermore, it was you who was in error and could not admit it. Funny how that works. Stop making excuses for the errors you have made.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
Maybe it is time for Kiril to grow up and see himself as others see him. Maybe it is time for Kiril to either quit Lawnsite or march to the drum instead of being out of step. Remember this is not a college classroom and most people reading here don't use or under stand technical term. However They are not dumb and can understand Ideas presented in Layman terms. BTW Layman terms much like the thread you wanted a University link even when you could find any thing wrong.
Don't really care how people see me. Accurate information is what I care about, and if you can't provide it, then either don't post or expect to be corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-27-2011, 09:11 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl-landscapes View Post
I guess its a case of what go's around comes around. Pull up all my posts 99.9% of them are me trying to help someone out (if I can) yours on the other hand are 99.9% talking down to people, belittling them and giving them "homework". I actually think you could be a big help to a lot of people if you would just step down of your high horse and lend a hand to someone who is looking for assistance.
Actually .... I only have problems with a handful of people on this site who think they are authorities in fields they have little to no understanding of. Then when I correct those very same people, it always results in petty childish games. The fact that I care enough to endure the childish bullshiit you and others dish in my direction so people can get accurate information to use in their everyday work, not only is helping them, it is also NOT assuming they are too stupid to understand the truth ..... unlike some people here.

Bottom line .... all I see here is you trying to make excuses for your childish behavior. So I tell you what ..... you and everyone else who has a problem with me, make use of the ignore option in your user control panel.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-27-2011, 09:21 PM
Landscape Poet's Avatar
Landscape Poet Landscape Poet is online now
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oviedo/Orlando
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post

Speaking of the Fertilizer bans or Black out. U of F recently released a study Than I lost with a computer crash. But They basically said the Fertilizer Ban was causing more pollution than Properly applied Fertilizer. They pointed out that Health Turf acts as a filter.
Ric,

Dr. Laurie Trenholm from U of F mentioned this in a recent Extension class I attended. She did not say anything about repealing it but she did indicate that they have or have had research under way that was showing leaching may not have been as bad as once thought on healthy turf.
__________________
"the art of survival is a story that never ends"

Providing Lawn Services, Landscape Installations and Solutions and Sod Services in the Oviedo Florida Market

If you aspire to a six-figure income, don't get advice from someone making $18,000 a year!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-27-2011, 09:24 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
Here is the other Link I was referring to about the consequences of Fertilizer Black out. Once again it is still being Published and our California Whiz might have you believe it is not.

http://fyn.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/SS49600.pdf
Ric, that is the exact "study" that I was referring to, the one you have referred to repeatedly, and the one the newspaper article I linked refers to and states was pulled. Now isn't that damned inconvenient. You might actually try to read the article.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article...icle/101031037
Titled "Unintended Consequences Associated with Certain Urban Fertilizer Ordinance," the study was published in March 2009 amid virulent debate at the Capitol -- and at the request of industry lobbyists.
.
.
.
.
But last month, after the Herald-Tribune made calls to researchers, IFAS removed the study from its website.

When asked why the institute would unpublish a study it views as scientifically sound, Payne said, "Maybe that wasn't the best strategy."

This is the first time the institute has ever unpublished a study because of criticism, Payne said.

"I'm pulling it only because the paper that's going to replace it is even stronger," Payne said, referring to a new study that is expected this year. "I am trying to show our critics that I'm listening to them."


Care to comment Ric? Can you comment on why the "study" presented no research of their own?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-27-2011, 09:33 PM
dishboy dishboy is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: zone 6
Posts: 3,348
Puts finger in air............................







yep it's January.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-28-2011, 01:25 AM
rob7233's Avatar
rob7233 rob7233 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 9b Central FL
Posts: 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by dishboy View Post
Puts finger in air............................







yep it's January.
Yes, sir it is. LOL

But really getting back to the study/results. The observation was (as I recall) and I'll do my best to summarize it - was that most SA (Floratam in this case) is actually environmentally friendly in it's ability to hold and filter fertilizer leachate and runoff. Compared to Zoysia, Floratam had at least a 50% advantage.

Now all would agree, even with our summer downpours that no measurable fert leaching occurs at the recommended UF rates. Now during the summer, with all the sun and rain available, Floratam will use up it's stored and available nutrients due to it's "turbocharged" growth rate. Any FL LCO will tell you that Floratam is just about ready for x2 a week cuts from 7/15 to just about 9/1 every year. We all notice how the Floratam turns a lighter shade of green during this time thus the suggestion for an FE application vs. N.

Now again, as I recall the research result was that during this time the root structure of the affected SA(Floratam) would decrease/retract as a response to the low fertility availability. This would lead to increased stress making it more prone to the disease and insect pressure(already higher during this time of year). This poorer quality of turf would have a lessened ability to act as a filter to leachates/runoff and be far less environmentally friendly.

Additionally, it was also further suggested that because of the increase of turf damage would likely result in the increase applications of insecticides and fungicides furthering a negative impact on the environment. Lastly, it was also suggested contrary to conventional wisdom that a properly applied mid summer fert application would be more beneficial than a "black out" ban period. Granted this would be a hard sell due to fert apps not likely being done at the UF recommended rates.

All this is a big deal since the Aquifer won't be able to support the population growth and we are now looking much harder to surface water sources. Most HO and even Professionals apply fert too heavy. If some is good, more must be better... I guess this is where the BMP cert process and fert license is supposed to come in !?? Even that since this last June BMP revision, the class has become more general.

How many of you that apply fertilizer, actually measure, calculate and weigh out the product? Fast or slow release, less than 30%? Do you know how or have taken the time to calibrate your spreader? You may even know how much product to spread over what area but everyone's rate of application may be different(yeah, I know that's getting real particular). What if your particuliar spreader model is not listed on the bag? What's the right setting? Lastly, is the client willing to spend extra for the time involved to do those things and get it right? I'm thinking this is probably a real green thing to do. Maybe one of the most.

Well, I hope I summarized the research that Ric was referring to. If need be I can probably get a link to the document. It wasn't some made up crap he heard in some newspaper, so stop the bickering. However, it does get pretty funny and entertaining at times......

Last edited by rob7233; 01-28-2011 at 01:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-28-2011, 02:28 AM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob7233 View Post
Well, I hope I summarized the research that Ric was referring to. If need be I can probably get a link to the document. It wasn't some made up crap he heard in some newspaper, so stop the bickering. However, it does get pretty funny and entertaining at times......
He already provided the link to the paper he was referring to (see post #43), and it wasn't research, despite what Ric says.

http://fyn.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/SS49600.pdf

No data was presented and no study was conducted. It was merely a paper of supposition and opinion. Were some valid points made .... yes, but the paper does not support what Ric says it does, which is the reason I even bothered to post in this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
Speaking of the Fertilizer bans or Black out. U of F recently released a study Than I lost with a computer crash. But They basically said the Fertilizer Ban was causing more pollution than Properly applied Fertilizer. They pointed out that Health Turf acts as a filter.
People need to stop reading what they want to see, and read what is written.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.com™ - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.13349 seconds with 8 queries