Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-09-2011, 11:01 PM
TheChiefsLawnCare's Avatar
TheChiefsLawnCare TheChiefsLawnCare is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, Louisiana
Posts: 957
cant buy a truck and call it a truck unless you got a v8. if you pulling a load and using a small v8 your gonna get worse gas milleage than a truck that has a bigger engine cause it dosent have to work as hard. it might end up being close to the same but still a truck should have a v8. 2500 or f250+ should be diesel deff not gas.
__________________
2007 GMC Sierra 1500 NBS
2012 7x16 Tandem Axel Enclosed Trailer
2006 Walker 36" GHS w/ 20HP Kohler
2012 Wright 32"
2011 Toro 32" wb Floating Deck w/ Kawi
2007 21" Snapper Hi-Vac w/ Kawi
2007 21" Heavy Duty Toro w/ Kawi
McLane Commerical Walk Behind Edger
Stihl FS 110R String Trimmer
Stihl FS110r String Trimmer
Stihl FC 110 Stick Edger
Stihl BR 600 Back Pack Blower
Stihl HL 100K (135º)Hedge Trimmer
Stihl HS81T Hedge Trimmer


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-09-2011, 11:07 PM
weeze's Avatar
weeze weeze is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: weezertonfieldville, AL
Posts: 5,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgaengineer View Post
I didn't see that gas mileage without a trailer and a supercharger!
Posted via Mobile Device
supercharger decreases mpg lol. i get 22mpg without the trailer and mine is 4x4
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-09-2011, 11:13 PM
cgaengineer's Avatar
cgaengineer cgaengineer is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 15,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonsLawnCare1 View Post
supercharger decreases mpg lol. i get 22mpg without the trailer and mine is 4x4
Yeah, mines a 4x4 too...before supercharger it didn't get but about 16 mpg tops...mine is the 2.7L
__________________
Georgia Applicator License Number 09102

"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-09-2011, 11:18 PM
lovemysan lovemysan is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: kansas city, mo
Posts: 16
2005 suburban 2wd with 5.3 does 10.5 mpg at 70 mph pulling 6500 lbs. It does 13-14 mpg with my small 6x12 trailer.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-10-2011, 12:22 AM
7625 7625 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 62
That really depends on your use. Only you can decide. I have a chevy 1500 half ton,paid for and wouldn't dream of getting anything smaller for better gas milage why. Here's why. On day's I don't need the trailer,( tandem axle 18 ft used to pull zturn,push mowers, and capable of hauling my JD tractor 4,000lbs and other stuff it will get 18-19 miles mpg when pulling big trailer it drops to 10-11 miles mpg. On the days that I can get by using my smaller 14ft tandem it still drops mpg to 12-14 mpg. If you have to your equipment to do the work then you have to have a trailer. A single axle trailer bounces your equipment all over, up and down and beats it to pieces. And if you have a blow out, look out. A smaller truck won't do the job. It will either struggle with the engine trying to pull the load, thereby using just as much gas and putting a strain on the engine and maybe tearing it up sooner or tearing up a transmission. Most people that by a truck for good mpg's are people that just go to work to the office every day but not real work, and get a high speed rear end to match the transmission to get the best gas milage. However if you want a truck that is going to do pulling and you want the transmission to stand up to the jerks and strains of everyday wear and tear, then get a real work truck, but only you can be the one to know what you needs are.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-10-2011, 12:38 AM
dishboy dishboy is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: zone 6
Posts: 3,346
V-6 Ecoboost 16-22 epa MPG, 420 llbs torque with 95% all in by 2250 RPM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-10-2011, 12:45 AM
madisonpressurewashing madisonpressurewashing is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville ,al
Posts: 366
V6 Tacoma get 17-19 no matter what I am carring
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-10-2011, 12:50 AM
cgaengineer's Avatar
cgaengineer cgaengineer is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 15,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by madisonpressurewashing View Post
V6 Tacoma get 17-19 no matter what I am carring
Have one of those too...never seen it.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-10-2011, 01:33 AM
Tinkerer's Avatar
Tinkerer Tinkerer is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St.Paul suburb
Posts: 616
One variable that is usually overlooked is the axle ratios:
One of my old trucks is a 93 F150 regular cab, long bed, 2 wheel drive, no a.c., 300-6 & 5 speed manual with 2.73 rear axle ratio. In town it got 13.5 mpg. Highway it got nearly 20mpg. With good tune and alignment low 20s on the highway. Most of my driving is in town. With some research I found out the same truck with a 3.55 rear axle ratio would get 15-18 mpg in town & about 18 mpg on the highway. Those years F150s could be bought with 2.73 (2wd only) , 3.08, 3.55 axle ratios. In 94 they started offering a 3.31 axle ratio.
A friend of mine has owned many 1/2 ton Chevy/GMC trucks with the 4.3 V6 and 3.42 axle ratios. He would get about 17-19mpg everywhere he goes. His newest GMC 1/2 ton 4x4 shortbed with 4.3 V6 truck only came with a 3.73 axle ratio and he gets 14mpg everywhere he goes.
__________________
Wanted: brochure showing Dixie Chopper pull type mower.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-10-2011, 01:54 AM
topsites topsites is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond Virginia
Posts: 21,677
It's just like with all the folks who would like me to work for free
I can't do it, I'll do it as low as I can go above the bare costs, but free ain't happening.

The problem is that at least with used trucks which are capable of pulling the weight and also get good fuel economy,
they are in such high demand that the price difference is more than noticeable, the cheapest trucks always have the
biggest engines, with used trucks nobody wants the gas guzzler.

It's so bad, when I bought my truck 4 years ago for $2500...
An equivalent truck that got decent fuel economy would have cost me $4000!
No, I am not kidding, you want a truck that's even remotely priced around Blue Book, then you're getting a guzzler.
Amazing how vehicles can be priced 40-100% over the price of Blue Book, but that's apparently the way it is.

We're talking my truck gets 10mpg, one that would have gotten 14+ would've cost me.
Well I can tell you for that $1500 I can buy a lot of extra fuel, it takes me 3-4 years in the price difference to even notice.

The only other truck you can find that gets good fuel mileage and does not cost an arm and a leg
is usually a bit slow on the uptake, like perhaps certain used government vehicles, or as someone
else mentioned, some V6 / 5.0 (305 / 318) V8.

Which is why I am always either driving a gas guzzler, or a truck that's a slouch.

Because you won't find powerful economy cheap.

Last edited by topsites; 04-10-2011 at 01:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.com™ - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM.

Page generated in 0.10041 seconds with 8 queries