Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-05-2002, 10:33 AM
AltaLawnCare's Avatar
AltaLawnCare AltaLawnCare is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Altavista, VA Transition Zone 7
Posts: 962
This picture was taken about 10 years ago, and it still looks like this today. LOL.
I've got to finish this car!
1970 Mustang
__________________
.... Billy


Altavista Lawn Care
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-05-2002, 11:14 AM
Swampbeast Swampbeast is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 463
True, the old Mustangs dont handle so well. Thats why I took my 68 and changed everything about it, the only thing that is stock is the frame and the body. Thats it! Steering, suspension, shocks, brakes, engine, tranny, seats, interior, roll cage, turbo, nitro, tires, rims, everything is all modified. So far we (me and the car club I am a member in) have a 9 second 1/4 mile. Working on getting a 8.75 second time! 6 speed racing tranny.
We also have a 73 Stang, just put a 460 big block in her.
Hmmm, looks like you need to sand her down some, and then paint her. Does it run? Cause if it doesnt, I would suggest replacing the engine with a monster. Like a 460. That would be cool!
I saw a 5.0 (I think in the 80s?) Mustang run a 1/4 mile in 5.32 seconds. Just think about that. Think how horrifyingly fast that is. 5.32 seconds. I would wet my pants!
I heard that Lingenfelter (Corvette tuner in Ft. Worth Texas) tunes 2002 Corvettes into 800 HP, 800 Ft/LB monsters that go from 0-60 in 1.97 seconds and run the 1/4 in 2 point something seconds. Top speed is over 260 MPH. Now I would ditch Ford in a heart beat if I could get ahold of one of those!


__________________
My Motto: "Excretus Occurus"
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-05-2002, 11:23 AM
Brickman's Avatar
Brickman Brickman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: eastern WY
Posts: 1,249
Those are some bad azz times!!!!!!!!!!

I don't think my Stroke would come close.

Oh wait, it is made for pulling big loads up the road.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-05-2002, 02:15 PM
AltaLawnCare's Avatar
AltaLawnCare AltaLawnCare is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Altavista, VA Transition Zone 7
Posts: 962
I've toyed with the idea of stroking a 302. There is a way to use a 351 crank.. This with aluminum Dart3 heads and a good carb, it would be pretty tough.

I would hate to spend the money in it and have a stock 5.0 dust me though!

In the early 90s I replaced the floors, shock towers, fender aprons, shock towers, doors, quarter panels. The body needs to be finished out and blocked. After the cut in is done (door jambs painted, etc. the engine and drive train need to be ready to go in so it doesn't just sit and get damaged.

I have pictures somewhere of it in a car cradle, I sand blasted the entire bottom of teh car and primed it with red oxide epoxy primer (an exact match for the way ford did it)

Lots of work in that little mustang.

I had some other nice Fords too, an 83 F150, a '66 Mustang with a 6 cyclinder. I sold both for more than I had in them.
__________________
.... Billy


Altavista Lawn Care
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-05-2002, 04:44 PM
CT18fireman CT18fireman is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Brookfield, CT
Posts: 609
I always hear people say that there is no replacement for displacement. i however built a small block for my 67 that can hold its own and lets the car handle alot better then with the front end weight of a big block.

Ford small blocks, though less common builds then chevies, can be built easily and with huge power gains.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-12-2002, 01:44 PM
TALLEY-HOE TALLEY-HOE is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 51
dodge (hemi)

I'm the one that just purchased the 2003 red Dodge (hemi), 2500, gasser. I was raised with chevy written all over me. those days are over. Put all the window sticker you want on your trucks, Ill stick with my Dodge. By the way---have a nice day!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-13-2002, 08:00 PM
HOMER HOMER is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Alabama the Beautiful
Posts: 3,183
A "2 something" 1/4 mile time is reallyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy stretching it. Top fuelers haven't hit that yet with 3500 HP.

But I bet my Cummins can get real close...........with $100,000.00 worth of mods!
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-13-2002, 09:14 PM
John DiMartino John DiMartino is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Walden,NY
Posts: 2,555
My local dealer has a few of the Hemi 's in stock,if they hold up 1/2 as good as they run they ought to be great trucks! These things are fast for 3/4 ton HD trucks!. Now on the diesel debate,being a 2 time Dodge /Cummins owner I am a little biased,truck to truck,there isnt anything better about a Dodge,it has a better turning radius,and is easier to work on,the Ford has better mirrors and way more configuartions.Now on to the engines,the powerstroke is a good engine,and they run great.But it really cannot be compared to the Cummins engine.IMO the Cummins B,and ISB are the strongest engines ever put in a pickup truck,by far.I dont mean horsepower,that can be changed on a Cummins easier than changing spark plugs on a gasser.Im talking sheer strength and durabilty.The Cummins is a medium duty engine,only the Cummmins is used in industrial applications,such as bulldozers,backhoes,excavators,loader,gensets,in addition to medium duty trucks,buses and boats.The engine is built to last and if you had one apart side by side,with a PSD,or have worked on /owned both,you would have to agree.My friends have PSDs, they are much harder to service/maintain than the Cummins/Dodge,even putting a 4" exhaust on a PSD is frustrating,working under the cowl with scraped knuckles.Oh the Cummins isnt the fastest truck stock,but they can haul the mail with afew and inexpensive mods.Mine is at 500hp 1000 ft lbs on #2 alone,very streetable,the PSD hits a wall at mid 400'sHp .As for the duramax ,it so far proven to be an excellent engine,IMO,and it has a ton of potential as far as power,there are already Dmaxes running mid 13's without a lot of mods,very impressive.The new 6.0 PSD looks like a winner so far too.
__________________
My Equipment Pictures
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-13-2002, 11:24 PM
Brickman's Avatar
Brickman Brickman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: eastern WY
Posts: 1,249
Quote:
the PSD hits a wall at mid 400'sHp







Maybe some of them.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-14-2002, 07:17 AM
John DiMartino John DiMartino is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Walden,NY
Posts: 2,555
Brickman,the only PSD's i know of tha make over 450hp on #2 only are Brian Kenny's white crew cab PSd,and Physcostrokers 96PSD. The injection pumps just arent capable of much more than that.It takes a ton of money to egt more.Now with propane,and nitrous i know more power can be had,but its the same for a Dodge.For lightly moded trucks the PSD is great,just add a chip,and your set they'll pull like a mule,with a Dodge auto,you need to do a shift kit if you add over 50hp,the Ford its done electronically when you load the chip.Brickman have you dyno'd,if so what is your Hp,and what is done to your engine?
__________________
My Equipment Pictures
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Page generated in 0.11038 seconds with 8 queries