Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-23-2011, 01:05 PM
Wet_Boots's Avatar
Wet_Boots Wet_Boots is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: metro NYC
Posts: 40,371
I think one of those ASV's was the rare Richdel "solenoid optional" model
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-23-2011, 04:23 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by irritation View Post
OK, that's more like California irrigation. ASV'S
The 205 is not an ASV.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-23-2011, 07:30 PM
mitchgo's Avatar
mitchgo mitchgo is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 2,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by irritation View Post
OK, that's more like California irrigation. ASV'S
You complain about ASV's above ground and also DCV's Below ground , pick your poison?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-23-2011, 09:07 PM
Mike Leary's Avatar
Mike Leary Mike Leary is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cactus Hug, Arizona
Posts: 20,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchgo View Post
You complain about ASV's above ground and also DCV's Below ground , pick your poison?
A DCVA installed to correct practices is miles ahead of that crap.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:15 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Leary View Post
A DCVA installed to correct practices is miles ahead of that crap.
No it's not.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:20 PM
mitchgo's Avatar
mitchgo mitchgo is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 2,659
Aesthetically it is.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:31 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchgo View Post
Aesthetically it is.
Who cares if it fails to protect the consumer?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-23-2011, 11:04 PM
Mike Leary's Avatar
Mike Leary Mike Leary is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cactus Hug, Arizona
Posts: 20,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiril View Post
No it's not.
Dare I ask, wtf is wrong with a properly installed and tested DCVA? It's Cali testing regs that govern the western states and British Columbia with Alberta. I have no problem with DCVAs when professionally managed. I still consider irrigation low hazard.

Last edited by Mike Leary; 10-23-2011 at 11:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-23-2011, 11:49 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Leary View Post
I still consider irrigation low hazard.
.............. I don't
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-23-2011, 11:50 PM
Wet_Boots's Avatar
Wet_Boots Wet_Boots is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: metro NYC
Posts: 40,371
A tested DCVA could fail nine seconds after you pass it as functioning properly.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Page generated in 0.09394 seconds with 8 queries