Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-09-2012, 09:10 PM
JB1's Avatar
JB1 JB1 is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: From the hills of beautiful Southern Indiana
Posts: 5,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by mx315 View Post
I will have to look into some used of both types. It will take some time to go through all the models and find the right fit. I've been renting some Takeuchi's with the joystick controls and they were pretty nice and a Bobcat with the foot controls that I hated.
JB, you guys had some really nice weather... it's been a crazy winter so far


yes it was great was there between christmas and new years also and had great weather, no winter this year.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-11-2012, 09:06 PM
GLS GLS is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Moline, IL
Posts: 1,140
A skidloader is definately more suited for heavy lifting, but I wouldn't rule a compact tractor out if you have bushhogging to do.

We own a kubota L3240. We are able to move most pallets of sod (some of the heavier ones need a few pieces taken off first), ours may be lighter than others. I would think a bigger L series or MX would be much better off. Again, not ideal for heavy lifting, but it may get the job done.

As someone else mentioned, rear forks are another option. If your pallets are delivered to the ground, you can move them with forks on the 3 pt, especially with a hydraulic toplink.



__________________
Ryan

Lawn & Landscape Maintenance -- Landscape Installation -- Snow Management

Work / Equipment Thread
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-13-2012, 09:42 AM
mx315's Avatar
mx315 mx315 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PC Beach, FL
Posts: 394
Thanks for the info, I would rather have a tractor for bush hogging and the price is better. I looked at some skid steers over the weekend and a used one with low hours is more than a new MX4700 with 5 implements. I found out that my friend using the L4400 never had weights or ballast on the back, so I'm sure that was a big reason for the wheel bearings to keep going out. I may have to load a couple of pallets a year into my dump trailer or onto my flatbed, so moving it around with the rear forks is a good option too.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-13-2012, 04:20 PM
lawn king's Avatar
lawn king lawn king is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: abington massachusetts
Posts: 2,127
Many models in the kubota L series will suit your needs, there is no need to buy an M series.
__________________
When i find myself in times of trouble, mother mary comes to me, speaking words of wisdom let it be.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-21-2012, 02:57 PM
mx315's Avatar
mx315 mx315 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PC Beach, FL
Posts: 394
I've looked at several models in the L Grand series and for the money I think the L3240 with the 724 loader maybe the best option. The lift capacity on the Grand series is better than the bigger budget models. I can get the rear hydraulic toplink forks and move the pallets. It's still small enough to get between houses and big enough for most things I need it to do.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-24-2012, 02:40 PM
lawn king's Avatar
lawn king lawn king is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: abington massachusetts
Posts: 2,127
Take a close look at the 3540 and the 3940 as well. I was in a similar situation and discovered the 35 worked better for me than the 32. The grand L's are nice, you will never regret the purchase!
__________________
When i find myself in times of trouble, mother mary comes to me, speaking words of wisdom let it be.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-26-2012, 09:22 AM
manatarms manatarms is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Morris County, NJ
Posts: 25
If you're looking at the MX4700, you might as well look at the MX5100. For a slight price increase you get more HP and telescopic 3pt. hitch arms...which are the cats meow and could not be added for the price the 5100 commands over the 4700.

-Mark

Quote:
Originally Posted by mx315 View Post
Thanks for the info, I would rather have a tractor for bush hogging and the price is better. I looked at some skid steers over the weekend and a used one with low hours is more than a new MX4700 with 5 implements. I found out that my friend using the L4400 never had weights or ballast on the back, so I'm sure that was a big reason for the wheel bearings to keep going out. I may have to load a couple of pallets a year into my dump trailer or onto my flatbed, so moving it around with the rear forks is a good option too.
__________________
2009 M59 with Hydro Thumb and lots of attachments
2008 ASV PT50
2011 F-350 DRW
Stihl, Husky and Dolmar power equipment
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-28-2012, 01:02 AM
SixFourStroker's Avatar
SixFourStroker SixFourStroker is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sedalia, MO
Posts: 5
For lifting that much of a load a skid steer would be best, but if you are still considering the tractor route check out something along the line of the M5040. They are a little heavier built and might take the load better. We have a 7040 and it's been great. I know its not apples to apples but just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-28-2012, 01:05 PM
Ecoscapes Ecoscapes is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chesterfield, NH
Posts: 48
64Stroker, how do you like that M7040? I sold my L3830 2 yrs ago and have been trying out skids, tractors, leaning towards L57 or M6040,70, does the M ever seem to big on jobsites? (if your using it for landscape jobs) I'm getting into driveway grading, woodlot thinning, boulder walls, I just don't want to get the L and have it not be enough but don't want to get the M and it be too much! What about towing? I have a F350srw diesel now, would need bigger truck for M? Thanks for any info -
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-28-2012, 01:49 PM
SixFourStroker's Avatar
SixFourStroker SixFourStroker is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sedalia, MO
Posts: 5
I really like it. We mainly use it to run our big round baler as I do custom hay baling in the summer. I use it in the winter to clear driveways and it does good but if anything it is a little big. Ours has a cab though so that makes it pretty good sized. I really think if you got a 6040 or even a 5040 with the industrial lo profile tires you would be happy with it. If you plan to do heavy loader work I would definitely lean towards an M. I have run several L series and the M's seem to have stronger hydraulics. I have cleared a few wood lots with it and it will take down a pretty decent sized tree. At times you wish you had an extra gear in the transmission, but for me that's not a deal breaker. The shuttle works really slick too. As far as towing. I pulled ours with my 03 F-350 srw and you didn't know it was back there. Ours has fluid in the tires and 2 sets of wheel weights as well. If you have any more questions feel free to hit me up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Page generated in 0.07010 seconds with 7 queries