Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 05-25-2012, 02:50 PM
Starbuy Starbuy is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Summit County, Ohio
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by cindyb View Post
Star, a question?



I take it they did finally approve since they have companies listed for services on the dupont site.
LCO's could get their hands on the stuff even in states that it may have not been permitted in yet. Maybe there was some of the product being sold through secondary markets from one person to another such as on eBay or other sites like this one where pros connect. So many ways to get products through state or even national borders. Maybe some distributors were selling it into those states at a certain point thinking all was clear.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 05-27-2012, 07:42 PM
cindyb's Avatar
cindyb cindyb is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 354
A really good time line
http://www.biocycle.net/2011/09/epa-...lis-herbicide/
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 05-27-2012, 09:57 PM
cindyb's Avatar
cindyb cindyb is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 354
dupont mailing some checks after news story

http://www.freep.com/article/2012052...CFRONTPAGE%7Cs
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 05-29-2012, 09:04 AM
Starbuy Starbuy is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Summit County, Ohio
Posts: 335
I'd like to remind every property owner that you may only have another year or less to file in court against Dupont for Imprelis damage due to the 2 year statute of limitations. Look at the date of the initial spraying of Imprelis on your lawn (or adjacent properties) and count two years from that. But, it might be concluded that you could proceed within 2 years of the resulting damage, so that would mean as you see damage this summer then there may be two years from that (consult an attorney). There are reports now of further damage on trees, shrubs and plants just showing up now and more to come as we hit dry spells and the plant sucks up more of that toxin.

Also, reportedly the Imprelis toxin has been known to migrate hundreds of yards from the initial application site as water takes it down to lower elevations. Keep an eye on the top new growth to see the new growth clustering or curling. What we see on the canopy is just the tip of the iceberg, as the roots below reportedly show even more damage and the plant can't take in the nutrients resulting in a slow death. Some professionals have not seen any actual recovery even from category 1 plants. Seems once it's hit it will eventually die or at the very least be permanently deformed and stunted...what recovery is that? Disclosure: I have no position in Dupont stock nor any plans to take a position (long or short) within the next year.

Still waiting on my first offer from Dupont to arrive and will evaluate it, but I have even more damage since the last two site visits and costs to fix all this have gone way up. Not looking good for Dupont.

Also, I understand insurance companies are refusing to pay one dime for Dupont's blunder; not to property owners and not to Dupont at this point since the insurance companies believe Dupont knew enough of the dangers and went ahead anyhow in marketing this chemical allegedly without proper labeling. Wouldn't want to be holding DD shares, that's for sure. But, that's just my perspective on their stock. Wait til their shareholders find out more and let's see if Dupont's insurance will even pay a penny for this.

Last edited by Starbuy; 05-29-2012 at 09:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 05-29-2012, 10:13 AM
AIRCORP AIRCORP is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Franklin, MO
Posts: 16
DuPont Benlate

Hi Cindy

I really can't comment on what happened in Florida with these attorneys. If you give me more information I may be able to offer an opinion on this. Obviously, if the Florida Supreme Court offered this ruling, there had to be something wrong with what the attorneys were doing.

I would suggest that you do not use this one instance to characterize attorneys in general. I'm not an attorney, but I've worked for many attorneys. Since 1993 I've only seen one attorney try to "cheat" their clients. In the end, that attorney was very upset because he ultimately had to face the consequences for his actions. He got what he deserved, and, the client also got what she deserved in the end.

Good attorneys will "root out" bad attorneys.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cindyb View Post
If I understand the Florida Supreme court ruling, this group of attorneys didn't do their clients right on the Benlate settlement. The tree company was expecting about $200,000.00 so the attorney kept the rest? So they were collecting part of the clients money and working with Dupont?

.
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 05-29-2012, 10:15 AM
AIRCORP AIRCORP is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Franklin, MO
Posts: 16
New York and California

No, New York and California never agreed to Imprelis applications in their states.


Quote:
Originally Posted by cindyb View Post
Star, a question?



I take it they did finally approve since they have companies listed for services on the dupont site.
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:37 AM
cindyb's Avatar
cindyb cindyb is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 354
Power outages and storms here, computer isn't working well.

Thanks for the updates.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:00 PM
Watty Watty is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuy View Post
Clarification to my above comment:

"Dupont has stated that it is completely within the rights of property owners to reject that and demand that the amount of the compensation relating to tree removal also be paid directly to the property owner so the property owner can choose who they want working on their property."
The offer I received included "Tree removal service to be provided by Dupont" listing a dollar amount value of that service. My counter offer letter asked for the dollar amount in lieu of the service. I simply stated that I prefer to make the arrangements myself. If they agreed to that, I would have settled. After a month of waiting, I received another copy of the original offer along with a letter stating that my counter offer was "REJECTED" After several attempts to speak with someone at Dupont about this detail, a representative finally did contact me. I was informed that the ONLY OPTION was for Dupont to make the arrangements...take it or leave it.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:08 PM
AIRCORP AIRCORP is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Franklin, MO
Posts: 16
Tree Removal

There may be other reasons for this. DuPont may not want you to measure the tree once it hits the ground and you find that they did not measure the tree correctly and perhaps under estimated its value.

Now what are you going to do?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watty View Post
The offer I received included "Tree removal service to be provided by Dupont" listing a dollar amount value of that service. My counter offer letter asked for the dollar amount in lieu of the service. I simply stated that I prefer to make the arrangements myself. If they agreed to that, I would have settled. After a month of waiting, I received another copy of the original offer along with a letter stating that my counter offer was "REJECTED" After several attempts to speak with someone at Dupont about this detail, a representative finally did contact me. I was informed that the ONLY OPTION was for Dupont to make the arrangements...take it or leave it.
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 05-30-2012, 08:16 AM
Starbuy Starbuy is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Summit County, Ohio
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watty View Post
The offer I received included "Tree removal service to be provided by Dupont" listing a dollar amount value of that service. My counter offer letter asked for the dollar amount in lieu of the service. I simply stated that I prefer to make the arrangements myself. If they agreed to that, I would have settled. After a month of waiting, I received another copy of the original offer along with a letter stating that my counter offer was "REJECTED" After several attempts to speak with someone at Dupont about this detail, a representative finally did contact me. I was informed that the ONLY OPTION was for Dupont to make the arrangements...take it or leave it.
Welcome Watty. I see you're new here. Thank you for your input.
Just a few questions:
1. How many site visits were done and when was your claim sent in and by whom?
2. Did you ever have any site visit done besides from the LCO (or are you the LCO)? Did Dupont send Davey Tree to measure your trees/shrubs with laser?
3. When did you receive the first offer from Dupont and how long was it from the time the claim was submitted?
4. What was the total $ compensation they offered you and for how many trees/shrubs/plants (heights and type)?
5. What state are you located in?

Are you affiliated with any law firm at this time?

Thanks for any information you care to give us. It would be most helpful!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.

Page generated in 0.09845 seconds with 8 queries