Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-05-2012, 01:42 PM
PremierT&L PremierT&L is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 222
Toro Grandstand 36 vs Exmark Vantage 36

I'm getting ready to buy 2 36 standers. I know these mowers are very similar, however what are the differences. Price and dealer support are going to be about the same. I have heard the exmark mulches better and the deck has a little more float than that of the toro, but I haven't used either yet. I have a demo of the exmark set up for this week, but probably won't get a chance to demo the grandstand. Thanks for any input!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2012, 01:46 PM
f50lvr2 f50lvr2 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 273
If they are the same as the larger versions I much preferred the control feel of the exmark. Not sure why it felt different but it seemed much smoother. Also the speed control on the exmark works simply limits the movement of the levers and I believe the Toro regulates the flow through the hydro motors.

They're so similar I'd get whichever was cheaper or from whatever dealer you prefer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-05-2012, 01:55 PM
yardguy28 yardguy28 is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,465
I own an 09 52" grandstand. when it was in the shop for a week I had a 52" vantage as a loaner.

the exmark did seem to drive smoother.

what I noticed being different besides the deck was the adjustable front bar and the controls were a bit larger.

that's about it.

you can't go wrong with one though. they are both great pieces of equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-05-2012, 03:23 PM
Cadger Cadger is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 13
I'm going to start up soon (newbie here) and I plan to buy the Exmark...most seem to agree that it has a better deck. The other day I stopped and talked to a crew in a Sam's Club parking lot, they had a Toro on their trailer. To my surprise, they said that they had run both brands and all four of them insisted that the Toro holds better on a hill. I had thought the only difference was the deck.

I did not think to ask them if both machines had similar tires, but I don't see much variety of tires in any machine I've looked at. I also didn't ask if both machines had the same deck width...that might make a difference because I believe the machines are designed so that the wheels are moved outboard to accommodate wider decks. Wider track with about the same weight could substantially improve hill performance.

Anyway, in asking everyone I run into for advice, I find I get LOTS of conflicting advice and I have to discount much of it and go with my gut. In my case, I want the "better" deck and the Exmark dealer seems easier to work with and has a better reputation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2012, 07:11 PM
yardguy28 yardguy28 is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadger View Post
I'm going to start up soon (newbie here) and I plan to buy the Exmark...most seem to agree that it has a better deck. The other day I stopped and talked to a crew in a Sam's Club parking lot, they had a Toro on their trailer. To my surprise, they said that they had run both brands and all four of them insisted that the Toro holds better on a hill. I had thought the only difference was the deck.

I did not think to ask them if both machines had similar tires, but I don't see much variety of tires in any machine I've looked at. I also didn't ask if both machines had the same deck width...that might make a difference because I believe the machines are designed so that the wheels are moved outboard to accommodate wider decks. Wider track with about the same weight could substantially improve hill performance.

Anyway, in asking everyone I run into for advice, I find I get LOTS of conflicting advice and I have to discount much of it and go with my gut. In my case, I want the "better" deck and the Exmark dealer seems easier to work with and has a better reputation.

my 52" grandstand handles hill exactly like the 52" vantage I had as a loaner for awhile.

as for better deck. I think exmark and toro put out an equally quality cut.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2012, 10:12 PM
PremierT&L PremierT&L is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by yardguy28 View Post
my 52" grandstand handles hill exactly like the 52" vantage I had as a loaner for awhile.

as for better deck. I think exmark and toro put out an equally quality cut.
Are the 2 machines equal. If you could buy either 1 which 1 would you buy? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2012, 10:29 PM
jbell36 jbell36 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: KANSAS
Posts: 1,195
the major difference i can see between the two, only for the 36" inchers though, is the height adjustment lever...the toro's is much smoother and it locks into place...for some reason they don't do this on the bigger models...it's an awesome setup, i've actually used one...the exmark doesn't do it though, kinda weird...if that was the deciding factor i would go with toro all the way...but here the best dealer offers exmark only so we would probably go exmark...oh, the toro's also look better imo, haha, kind of stupid i know but when you are spending that much money on a mower you might think about it...

in about a year i believe we are going to trade our grandstands in and get 4 exmarks, mainly because of dealer support...(they dropped their toro line a year after i bought mine, of course...)

oh also, the decks on the toro (48" +) have a point to them on the left (non discharge side) that will catch obstacles much easier and harder, the exmarks are more or less curved and would slide past easier...just some things i've noticed between the two since we are in the market also...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2012, 09:30 AM
yardguy28 yardguy28 is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by PremierT&L View Post
Are the 2 machines equal. If you could buy either 1 which 1 would you buy? Thanks.
next time around i'll be getting the vantage.

one big reason is because my dealer was forced to choose between toro or exmark from toro buying exmark. they chose exmark.

also exmarks controls are larger and the fron bar is adjustable.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-06-2012, 12:41 PM
BestImpressions99 BestImpressions99 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Middle East TN
Posts: 491
Funny I have a thread on here "dealer steering us away from stander" or something similar to that. Our exmark dealer told us to steer clear of standers. They Vantage was a dangerous machine to them. Funny thing is the Grandstand is Awesome.
__________________
Best Impressions Lawn Care - est. 1998
2 operations in different cities (Expansion is awesome)
48" Grandstand and 52" Stander X
48" TTHP
2 44" Toro WB's
Shindaiwa weed eaters
Stihl Backpack Blowers
Stihl and Husqvarna Chainsaws
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2012, 01:01 PM
Green Skapes's Avatar
Green Skapes Green Skapes is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marengo, IL
Posts: 20
When it comes to stand-on mowers, I would ONLY buy a Wright Stander. We use Wright and Ferris mowers. My mowers will cut better than any out there any day of the week!
__________________
Tim Ring
Green Skapes Lawe Care & Landscaping
815-568-3110
www.greenskapes.com
www.facebook.com/greenskapes
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Page generated in 0.13898 seconds with 7 queries