Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2012, 01:45 AM
vic3500 vic3500 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8
Deere 320 or Cat 248

Hello all,

Hoping to tap into the valuable wealth of experience here.

Im looking to buy one of 2 machines, hoping to get some opinions on which way to go.

2006 Deere 320 $14000
2000 hours
bucket and forks
open cab

2003 Cat 248 $15000
high flow
72 bucket
2200 hours
closed cab and heat

to be used for gravel drive maintenance and snow removal on my acreage as well as snow removal on a couple commercial lots, just for stacking as my buddy is doing the plowing in his truck. The snow will be 5-10 days a year max.

looking for opinions on price, hours, stability, vertical vs radial lift, cab vs no cab etc.
Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2012, 09:30 AM
Digdeep Digdeep is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,787
I'm asssuming that it is a B series since it has high flow. I would go with the 248. You're getting 12 net hp more, a good high flow system and an enclosed cab for $1000 more. I wouldn't want to do any snow work with an open cab so the heat would be nice and dry, the high flow will offer you some increased options in the future (maybe a snowblower??) and it will help the resale. Good luck with your choice.
__________________
Digdeep
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2012, 09:37 AM
bobcat_ron's Avatar
bobcat_ron bobcat_ron is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia
Posts: 9,950
Cat. If you are a portly gentleman, you will appreciate the easier entry and exit of the larger cab opening. And the visibility is better too when the loader arms are up slightly, and another bonus, the loader on the Cat isn't goofy.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2012, 09:38 AM
vic3500 vic3500 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8
Thx for the reply Digdeep!
Btw, I may mistaken, but I'm pretty sure it is not a B series. I'm basing this on a serial number lookup and year made, plus the decals simply say "248", but it definitely has high flow.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2012, 12:16 PM
vic3500 vic3500 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8
Thx Ron,

What do you mean by goofy?
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2012, 01:28 PM
bobcat_ron's Avatar
bobcat_ron bobcat_ron is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia
Posts: 9,950
I hate their loaders, lots of farmers here complain about the booms and view to the wheels compared to Bobcat and Cat's vertical path loaders.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-29-2012, 01:40 PM
vic3500 vic3500 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8
Oh I see. I though the 248 had a radial loader?
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2012, 01:44 PM
bobcat_ron's Avatar
bobcat_ron bobcat_ron is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia
Posts: 9,950
Yes. And for the record, there is a Deere sales rep that is driving around our area trying like hell to sell a 318D, the last place it was dropped off at, our customer said they hated it with a passion. Terrible pilot control and when they carry round bales, they can't see a damn thing with the loader blocking the side view, so they end up going backwards with only tunnel vision on the rear. Piss poor design.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2012, 02:39 PM
vic3500 vic3500 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8
Good to know !
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-08-2012, 12:04 PM
vic3500 vic3500 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8
Machine is back on the market. Guy said only leaks were at the aux hydraulics. Seems obvious by the photos here. Anything else i should be leery of, esp since the last deal fell through?
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Page generated in 0.07082 seconds with 8 queries