Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-16-2012, 09:59 AM
murfpcola murfpcola is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: pensacola FL
Posts: 30
Bunton blades wont disengage.

I just bought a Bunton 48" gear drive walk behind mower that was in the process of an engine swap. I used the belt that was already routed through the deck. With the blades disengaged I can crank the mower and it will run a few seconds then the belt grabs the pulley and the blades start turning. I adjusted the idler pully further away from the blades. I adjusted the little L brackets away from the pulleys a little bit. I then tightened the brake band that stops the blades from turning. When I cranked it they did not turn but I could see smoke from where the engine pulley was rubbing on the belt. My thoughts are that the belt is too small. The mower is well used and Im sure has had many people work on it over the years so anything is possible. I am pretty mechanical but have never worked on a mower like this. I also dont have a manual for it yet. My question is if I have the tensioner adjusted where it is not really pushing in on the belt and the deck still turns, Does it seem like the belt is probably too small? thanks for any input!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2012, 10:46 PM
murfpcola murfpcola is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: pensacola FL
Posts: 30
Any input? Does it sound like the belt is too short?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2012, 08:14 PM
murfpcola murfpcola is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: pensacola FL
Posts: 30
Found number on belt and it is the correct belt. I was able to download a parts manual for this mower. Still tinkering with my wont disengage problem. Any advice?? At one point I tightened the blade brake but when I cranked the mower The belt was trying to grab and making a squealing sound. Do I just keep loosening the tensioner? One thought I have is the engine pulley may have been swapped and is too narrow for the belt not allowing it to slip like it should. This mower was kind of a basket case that I had to put back together and I am sure has been worked on by many people in the past so anything is possible. Any tips or suggestions are appreciated!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2012, 08:23 PM
ztman ztman is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mountain pa
Posts: 813
If it was in the middle of an engine swap, they may have done some other work, like replacing the pullys with ones they had laying around. Make sure they are the right size
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-20-2012, 08:56 PM
murfpcola murfpcola is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: pensacola FL
Posts: 30
Yeah thanks for the input. Checking out the pulleys is my next step. Hopefully I can find part numbers on them to compare. The pulleys were on the engine with the hole in the block but the set screws were missing. This does not mean they are correct because the mower will still work fine as long as you dont need to shut off the blades. I broke one of the brake bands that was pretty much worn through, so I am now trying to find some bands. They are apparently discontinued so trying to find some old stock but also doing some thinking about cutting down one for an Exmark and welding the end back on.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-20-2012, 11:11 PM
ztman ztman is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mountain pa
Posts: 813
good luck, you will have to come up with a new name for that mower by the time you get done
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Page generated in 0.06516 seconds with 7 queries