The Green Industry's Resource Center

aaronmg · #21 02-05-2013, 09:13 PM

jhayden, that's a good website you got there. did you design it yourself?

tonygreek · #22 02-05-2013, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ELS Landscape

I am not a fan of the font selected. Hard to Read

I agree. The font and colors contribute to it being difficult to read. From a design standpoint, the 50/50 Web 2.0 style gradient he used went out of design style a few years ago so, to me, it looks out of style before it's had a chance to be put in use.

edit: Missed the date stamp on the photo the first time I looked at it. That explains the Web 2 vibe.

aaronmg · #23 02-05-2013, 10:31 PM

Disregard that web stamp of 2007, every time I replace the batteries in my pos camera it relapses to that date... I didn't change the date... ok I'll post the website on here for everyone to look at the other logos...

http://www.logoarena.com/vote/aarons...lct1pykhw45gfb

tonygreek · #24 02-05-2013, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaronmg

Disregard that web stamp of 2007, every time I replace the batteries in my pos camera it relapses to that date...

No offense, but that specific design is appropriate for the time/date stamp. The designer(s) seems reeeeally gradient-happy in several of those.

26, 29, 9, in that order, for me. Simple, impactful, clean, easy to read, and then there are the over-designed ones with the guy and the spreader. Just too much to quickly take in, which is not a good thing for people driving by. I think the one you featured is easily in my bottom group.

aaronmg · #25 02-05-2013, 11:06 PM

No offense taken!!! I extended the contest another three days. Your right about the quick intake.. But I see 29 and the area i'm in people will think I'm selling rolling rock beer... I like the spreader guy cause its really the only one that without the name it says fertilizer. Great discussion I need this!!!