Advanced Search

The Green Industry's Resource Center

Old 02-08-2013, 06:05 PM
IngramLawnCare IngramLawnCare is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ambler, Pa
Posts: 6
Zero Z Master 6000 V. Scag Turf Tiger?

Does anyone have experience with either of these zero turns. I need some recommendations on getting one or the other or perhaps another suggestion from another manufacture. Thanks
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 09:18 PM
dathorpe dathorpe is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Marshall, Va.
Posts: 442
I've owned alot of 500 series Z Masters and I think they're solid machines. Mechanically, the only issues I really ever had were the hydro pumps leaking badly. The deck on the new gen 5000 & 6000 series is the same Turbo Force deck that the 500 series carried. And that's where I have a problem with Toro. Just like Exmark, when the grass is wet with dew, they tend to clump. Because of that, I have to go back over thick areas a second time. Countless man hours wasted. I'm currently in the process of selecting new zeros and I'm leaning toward getting Scag Turf Tigers so that I might be able to cut grass covered in morning dew without clumps all over the lawn and just maybe... for once... not have to spend time SCRAPIN' FRIGGIN' DECKS BECAUSE THEY ARE PACKED WITH CLIPPINGS! I am trying to pick up the pace of my lawn crew and therefore I'm moving away from clumping decks and towards a deck (possibly Velocity by Scag) that can help me be more efficient with the mowing crew.

That's why I'm also looking at EFI engines...
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Layout Style:

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Grand View Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.

Page generated in 0.05886 seconds with 8 queries