Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2013, 10:09 AM
Dirt Boy's Avatar
Dirt Boy Dirt Boy is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 446
dual water supply

Gents:
customer wants to be able to utilize both well & city water for sprinkler system.
Attached a simplified diagram.
What should I be considering here.
1. House would have a PVB
2. A check valve between well and city (to keep city out of well)
3. Pump start relay with no flow/overheat protection.

What else am I missing?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2013, 11:13 AM
HanktheCowdog HanktheCowdog is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 13
A PVB is not allowed to be used with back pressure. You need an RPZ. In Texas, if you even have a well and city water on the same property (not even connected), they will make you put an RPZ on the downstream side of the city water meter. They don't want any well water getting back into the city side. Some of the wells in town are highly contaminated.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2013, 11:20 AM
DanaMac's Avatar
DanaMac DanaMac is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere in the state of CO
Posts: 13,057
If I recall from our local codes, there must a way to disconnect the mainline pipes between the backflow valve, and the well. They don't want any way for water from the well to put back pressure on the device even if it were an RP, as any device can fail. So there must be some kind of disconnect, possibly with unions and ball valves, at least for our codes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2013, 11:57 AM
Mike Leary's Avatar
Mike Leary Mike Leary is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Port Angeles, Washington
Posts: 20,572
What those dudes said. Up north, wells are considered a "cross-connection" to City water and only permitted with a RPZ installed AT THE METER and tested annually. This is called "Premises Isolation" and I've heard some horror stories about hot water heaters in a "closed loop" system. Best practice would be two separate systems, avoiding "cross connection" connected to the same clock. Even so, the purveyor has the right to call for a RPZ.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2013, 12:27 PM
Wet_Boots's Avatar
Wet_Boots Wet_Boots is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: metro NYC
Posts: 39,699
Aside from local purveyor preferences, the uppermost requirement will be in the construction codes. That will be for an RPZ to isolate the house from the sprinkler system, which will be considered a toxic backpressure situation.

Even if someone is in a locale without that requirement in their local or state codes, they would be extremely foolish to not use the RPZ.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2013, 02:30 PM
Dirt Boy's Avatar
Dirt Boy Dirt Boy is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 446
Thanks guy's, makes sense, and that's the way I will bid the job. That is what our reg's are as well, RPZ, no other requirements other than that. should have known, or figured that out first.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2013, 04:48 PM
Wet_Boots's Avatar
Wet_Boots Wet_Boots is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: metro NYC
Posts: 39,699
Protection for the well itself might be included, or at least planned for, in terms of pressure loss when added on, sometime in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2013, 07:55 PM
Mike Leary's Avatar
Mike Leary Mike Leary is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Port Angeles, Washington
Posts: 20,572
When I was a CCS, no matter what the contractor or the the client told us, the possibility of some dimwad down the road making a repair and tying into the potable was probable, so we mandated RPZs. Our lawyers mandated it to protect the City liability.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-22-2013, 10:26 PM
Wet_Boots's Avatar
Wet_Boots Wet_Boots is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: metro NYC
Posts: 39,699
RPZs have been Washington State code for awhile now, in a irrigation backpressure situation, so no surprises there.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-23-2013, 09:37 AM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wet_Boots View Post
Protection for the well itself might be included
No "might" about it ........
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Page generated in 0.07793 seconds with 10 queries