Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2013, 01:03 AM
Holland's Avatar
Holland Holland is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 546
Help choosing a 30-36" Exmark mower to my solo outfit.

Hey guys. Hope your ready for Spring!! So I bought myself a 2006 48" Turf Tracer a few weeks back and love it. Thanks for all your help.
I already have a decent 21" Toro, but I need a 30-36" mower also and I'll be set. I'm currently looking at an older model Viking 36" for about $1100 that's in great shape, and also a new condition Exmark commercial 30" mower for $1500. Should I go for one of these or keep looking for a used 36" Turf Tracer?
My budget on the 30-36" is $1500.
Any opinions are welcome. Thanks again!
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2013, 02:05 AM
dstifel's Avatar
dstifel dstifel is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: des moines ia
Posts: 802
Help choosing a 30-36" Exmark mower to my solo outfit.

I used to run a Viking quite a bit when I worked for a company no complaints, but seeing as you already have a 48 i would go with the 30. Jmo
__________________
2011 chevy 2500
2012 chevy 2500
2012 ford f250
00 chevy 3500 dump
03 dodge dakota
4 ferris wb
1 ferris ztr
2 exmark ztr
lesco spreader sprayer stand on
case 1845
western plows
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2013, 03:06 AM
Holland's Avatar
Holland Holland is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 546
Yeah I honestly really want one of those 30s. Will be much more versatile in tite areas and will basically be a 21" replacement and only 6" less than a bulky 36".
Just not sure.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-03-2013, 05:45 AM
rbljack rbljack is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 566
i have the exmark 30 and have been happy so far, but its too early to tell. I know for a fact its going to be lighter than a full blown walk behind, and take up less space on a trailer. It doesn't completely replace a 21 inch mower because there are time when I need one of those also (smaller gates). But I am getting a lot of use out of the Exmark 30, and it fits in places where a 32 or 36 walk behind wouldn't go.

If you have any question about the exmark 30, check out the thread I started on it. If you do a search on here, it should show up for ya. I started my review on it, and will be posting updates as the season goes by. Others are posting in there as well.

If you can get an exmark 30 for 1500 cash new.....that's a bargain too! Mine came out to $1944 after tax and the optional Mulching Kit/baffle assembly. Mine came with a high lift blade designed for bagging, and I cant comment on its mulching abilitiy yet because its too early in the season. I do plan to compare the stock high lift blades mulching ability to the Low lift blade and Baffle assembly that I purchased as an option. We shall see. figured I should mention it though in case you decide to pick up the exmark.
__________________
Equipment Stolen/ Please Help and watch for:
6.5x12 Dual Ramp Trailer with 3 place trimmer rack and two blower racks
2012 21" Honda HRC-216 mower
2013 Exmark Commercial 30
2014 Exmark Lazer Z S Series EFI 52
2008 Stihl FS250R Trimmer
2010 Stihl FS90R Trimmer
200? Stihl FC75 Edger
2014 Stihl KM130R edger and trimmer shafts

2013 Stihl BR600 Backpack blower
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-03-2013, 11:26 AM
Valk's Avatar
Valk Valk is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 2,721
Holland, if you're doing a lot of bagging then an ExMark/Toro 30 (rear bagger) would be a better choice for tight areas than a WB with a side-bagger. If you're mostly side-discharging then I'd go with a commercial 32 or 36 to improve clipping dispersal and QOC. Just my humble opine.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
~ cut it high ~ let it fly ~
---------------------------------------------------
Some folks are so contrary that if they fell into a river,
they'd insist on floating upstream.
~ Josh Billings
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-2013, 04:25 PM
Holland's Avatar
Holland Holland is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 546
Thanks for the responses. Still debating. But if i could find a turf tracer hydro 36 used and cheap I'd do that. That 30 still is calling me though. Hehehe
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2013, 05:22 PM
Kevin R Kevin R is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 40
[QUOTE=Valk;4729895]Holland, if you're doing a lot of bagging then an ExMark/Toro 30 (rear bagger) would be a better choice for tight areas than a WB with a side-bagger. If you're mostly side-discharging then I'd go with a commercial 32 or 36 to improve clipping dispersal and QOC. Just my humble opine.[/QUOTE]


I agree with this, but I would still use the 30 for side discharge IMO.

KR
__________________
2011 Navigator 42"
2011 Vantage 52"
2012 Commercial 21 X-Series
2013 Commercial 30
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-03-2013, 11:10 PM
Holland's Avatar
Holland Holland is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 546
I think im gonna go with the 30. Mowing mostly small residential lawns I think it will be a good choice. Thanks for the help.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2013, 05:46 AM
rbljack rbljack is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 566
not trying to sell ya on the exmark 30, but it offers more versatility. you can switch from bagging to mulching, AND quickly change the cutting heights..which cant be done as easily with the WB.
__________________
Equipment Stolen/ Please Help and watch for:
6.5x12 Dual Ramp Trailer with 3 place trimmer rack and two blower racks
2012 21" Honda HRC-216 mower
2013 Exmark Commercial 30
2014 Exmark Lazer Z S Series EFI 52
2008 Stihl FS250R Trimmer
2010 Stihl FS90R Trimmer
200? Stihl FC75 Edger
2014 Stihl KM130R edger and trimmer shafts

2013 Stihl BR600 Backpack blower
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:19 AM
Valk's Avatar
Valk Valk is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 2,721
Granted, I side-discharge well over 95% of the time. So, personally, I'd be most concerned about the QOC/clipping dispersal. Wet/moist/dewy conditions need power/torque to spread the clippings out. That little bar at the bottom of the side-discharge chute might very well be a hindrance in less than optimal conditions.

How wide is the mower with the lil side-discharge chute attached?

I'm all in favor of this mower being all it can be. Lack of commercial power and blade choices are what stick out to me at the present time. Looking forward to more reviews.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
~ cut it high ~ let it fly ~
---------------------------------------------------
Some folks are so contrary that if they fell into a river,
they'd insist on floating upstream.
~ Josh Billings
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM.

Page generated in 0.15659 seconds with 9 queries