Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-01-2013, 08:41 PM
JDGlandscape's Avatar
JDGlandscape JDGlandscape is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by peeklandscaping View Post
I'm leaning toward the diesel engine. I've heard the maintenance is more tricky and expensive- is that true? Diesel gets how much better milage during regular trailer-hauling use? Approx how many miles to a gallon?
In my post I listed the things that I tow the most, and the average MPGs I get towing those things. When I average my trailers together, I get 7.8 mpg with the gas engine, and 14.5 with the diesels. And the new 6.7s get even better mileage than my diesels do!
__________________
2005 F350 supercab 6.0 powerstroke
1999 F350 supercab 7.3 Diesel Boss V plow
1999 F350 Dump 7.3 Diesel 9' Fisher plow
2002 F250 supercab 5.4
2005 Exmark 52" Lazer Z HP
2013 Gravely Pro-Turn 460
2004 Exmark Metro 48" Walkbehind
redmax and Husky blowers and trimmers
1990 John Deere small tractor
2012 8.5x18 with a 3' V Enclosed trailer
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-01-2013, 08:52 PM
JDGlandscape's Avatar
JDGlandscape JDGlandscape is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 388
as far as maintenance goes, I dont find it all that much worse. I mean yeah your going to use 13 quarts instead of 7 each oil change, but in the grand scheme of things, whats an extra hundred bucks over the course of a year on a truck that is already so expensive?

Then you have fuel filters, again just about 50-75 bucks more per year. big deal.

No spark plugs or coils though

The part that does get you on the diesels though is cost of repairing them. They do get pricey when things go wrong depending on the problem. But if you plan on selling it within the 5 year warranty then thats a non-factor. Even after then I have never had that much of a problem.. Until I started the process of bulletproofing my 6.0 that is
__________________
2005 F350 supercab 6.0 powerstroke
1999 F350 supercab 7.3 Diesel Boss V plow
1999 F350 Dump 7.3 Diesel 9' Fisher plow
2002 F250 supercab 5.4
2005 Exmark 52" Lazer Z HP
2013 Gravely Pro-Turn 460
2004 Exmark Metro 48" Walkbehind
redmax and Husky blowers and trimmers
1990 John Deere small tractor
2012 8.5x18 with a 3' V Enclosed trailer
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-01-2013, 09:00 PM
JCLawn and more's Avatar
JCLawn and more JCLawn and more is online now
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDGlandscape View Post
as far as maintenance goes, I dont find it all that much worse. I mean yeah your going to use 13 quarts instead of 7 each oil change, but in the grand scheme of things, whats an extra hundred bucks over the course of a year on a truck that is already so expensive?

Then you have fuel filters, again just about 50-75 bucks more per year. big deal.

No spark plugs or coils though

The part that does get you on the diesels though is cost of repairing them. They do get pricey when things go wrong depending on the problem. But if you plan on selling it within the 5 year warranty then thats a non-factor. Even after then I have never had that much of a problem.. Until I started the process of bulletproofing my 6.0 that is
6.0 is a swear word. I wonder what the new cummins get for mpg. I know if you do a delete kit and take all the epa crap off you gain a good 100hp and one guy who was selling one said he was getting 22-25 mpg driving around. I would imagine it would get like 16ish stock and 14-15 pulling a trailer.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-01-2013, 10:19 PM
JDGlandscape's Avatar
JDGlandscape JDGlandscape is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 388
When I bought my 6.0 I did look long and hard at the new ford, dodge anChevy, although I am a diehard ford man Ididn't want to just buy a new truck without checking out the competition. after doing a lot of research the ford was atop my list with the dodge being second. I just didn't like anything about the dodge except the name cummins on the side of the truck. After lots of research I would believe 21-22 empty with that truck but 25 sseems like an absolute stretch. Tuned and deleted or not both brands seem to be getting 21-22 Tops. And tthat's only 2013 and above for dodge because when they had the setup like the 6.4 Ford they weren't getting even close to the same mileage as the 2011+ fords
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-01-2013, 10:42 PM
JCLawn and more's Avatar
JCLawn and more JCLawn and more is online now
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDGlandscape View Post
When I bought my 6.0 I did look long and hard at the new ford, dodge anChevy, although I am a diehard ford man Ididn't want to just buy a new truck without checking out the competition. after doing a lot of research the ford was atop my list with the dodge being second. I just didn't like anything about the dodge except the name cummins on the side of the truck. After lots of research I would believe 21-22 empty with that truck but 25 sseems like an absolute stretch. Tuned and deleted or not both brands seem to be getting 21-22 Tops. And tthat's only 2013 and above for dodge because when they had the setup like the 6.4 Ford they weren't getting even close to the same mileage as the 2011+ fords
Posted via Mobile Device
Well my dad gets 7-8mpg in his 600hp (around 18L cummins) kensworth while grossing 80,000 lbs. He has gotten 10mpg empty. Point being an engine about 1/3 the size and a truck a 10th the weight should get 3 times the mpg. I will give ford this, my ex gf's father was the ceo of the company that designs the front end linkage for ford, chevy, and dodge trucks. He said ford has the best frontend hands down, but 2014-2015 dodges will be just as good because dodge is finnaly letting them design it the way they want.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-02-2013, 06:29 AM
peeklandscaping's Avatar
peeklandscaping peeklandscaping is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Fairfield County CT
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallihergreen View Post
With those questions answered, I'd go with a 350 DRW diesel with either a dumping flatbed, or a mason/contractor dump body.
Posted via Mobile Device

I'd like a dumping flatbed, but don't want a dually. Will it work, or is it too much strain on the rear tires/ axle? I saw these too: http://www.northerntool.com/shop/tools/product_552_552

are they any good, or does the body bend out of shape under a load?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-02-2013, 08:12 AM
precision8m's Avatar
precision8m precision8m is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 209
If you are going to use the truck for personal use then get a srw. If it is only for business use then go drw flatbed or dumpbed. Ford makes the strongest parts in their trucks but their engines have been jokes. I still don't trust the new 6.7's. Best deisel engine made is a cummins and I have had a much better experience with my dodges than my fords but I cant deny that the ford parts are stronger. Don't fool with gas trucks.
__________________
2005 Isuzu NPR turbo diesel 16' box
2004 Ram 1500 Hemi
2000 Ram 2500 24 valve CTD
1996 Ram 2500 12 valve CTD
1999 F350 7.3 PSD flatbed
20' enclosed, 16' open, 14' dump
2 Walker MT 48", Toro Z500 60",
Toro proline 48", Dixon ZTR 42"
Stihl small equipment
SC licensed pesticide applicator
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-02-2013, 08:27 AM
Dually00-00's Avatar
Dually00-00 Dually00-00 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bucks county Pa
Posts: 177
You might like this.
http://charlottesville.craigslist.or...875254013.html
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-02-2013, 09:35 AM
gallihergreen's Avatar
gallihergreen gallihergreen is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Research Triangle, NC
Posts: 2,719
This is a pretty sweet set-up. It's WAY overpriced IMO. But still sweet.

http://york.craigslist.org/cto/3865606673.html
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-02-2013, 09:01 PM
peeklandscaping's Avatar
peeklandscaping peeklandscaping is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Fairfield County CT
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallihergreen View Post
This is a pretty sweet set-up. It's WAY overpriced IMO. But still sweet.

http://york.craigslist.org/cto/3865606673.html
Posted via Mobile Device
talk about overpriced! that's more than a brand new one! (cool looking rig though)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Page generated in 0.07445 seconds with 7 queries