Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:08 PM
grassmasterswilson grassmasterswilson is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: nc
Posts: 3,267
Walker ghs vs exmark navigator

I currently have a walker and might be interested in adding another for fall leaves and smaller residential lawns in the growing season.

I have loved my walker but wonder what the difference is between the two brands. Has anyone used both and if so what were your thoughts.
__________________
GrassMasters, LLC
Wilson, NC
www.grassmasterswilson.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2013, 08:17 PM
maplecreek's Avatar
maplecreek maplecreek is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sudlersville Maryland
Posts: 47
Walker ghs vs exmark navigator

I use the navigator and have run them both. Navigator is a strong machine and will do a great job for fall cleanups. And they are easy to service. Exmark in my opinion is a heavier built machine. Hope this helps
__________________
Maple Creek Property Solutions

Doin Work!!


2002 Lazer Z 27HP Kohler 60" Exmark
2004 Navigator 27HP Kohler 48" 9.5 Bushel Bagger Exmark
2002 Utility Trailer
Shindaiwa equipment
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2013, 09:10 PM
Armsden&Son Armsden&Son is online now
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: adirondacks, NY
Posts: 1,875
I currently run MT 26 EFI's and I wonder the same thing... I mean, I absolutely love Walker's cut... But, Exmarks leave a great cut too... Just look at Gold Pro's equipment thread in the photo section... Granted, that is a Lazer but I have seen Navigator stripes and they are sweet. Better than Walker's? Not sure... The navigator deck is deeper for sure but not by much.... I mean, either way you are buying a $13,000 lawn mowing masterpiece... One of the reasons that I went Walker was for the ability to side discharge... I haven't yet, but plan on buying either a 62 or 74 in. side discharge deck for my MT and so far, the navigator is not offering larger decks...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-2013, 09:11 PM
Armsden&Son Armsden&Son is online now
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: adirondacks, NY
Posts: 1,875
Hey there Maple Creek..... Would you happen to have any Navigator stripe photos to share? I am a stripe junkie and would love to see some... Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-03-2013, 09:29 PM
fllee fllee is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: ocala fl
Posts: 21
I have several walkers. Look at parts on ebay and you will see walkers are much more available. Walkers are indeed much easier do do work on. Many more walkers on the yards means the are doing something correct. The MT`s are by far the best choice for the guy that wants to do his own work.......
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-03-2013, 09:43 PM
Keith's Avatar
Keith Keith is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,795
Hey, fllee. Welcome to LS

Are you cutting mostly St Augustine with your Walkers? I've got a few questions for you about it, but I don't want to go too far off topic in this thread. If you get a chance take a look at this thread over in the Florida forum http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=412413
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2013, 04:45 AM
mdghs mdghs is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NY state
Posts: 31
I own 2 ghs Walkers,48" MDghs and a 52" 26efi MTghs. I also own a 27hp 48" Navigator. Pros and cons to both brands. Both are good machines. The 52 ghs and the 48 navigator leave a great cut and both good in wet grass(not perfect in wet but good). The Walker 48ghs is best for leaf clean up. Walker belts are much easier to change in the field while it is a pain to change the Navigator belts. These are just my thoughts, other Walker and Navigator owners thoughts may differ.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-04-2013, 07:17 AM
fllee fllee is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: ocala fl
Posts: 21
Walker engine out in 30 mins., Blower housing is repairable(weldable to beef it up in wear area), NO ELECT. clutch to wear out, and lots and lots of parts availability........interchangeable decks........sometimes people think they have a walker hydro pump failure but in reality only a screen plugged up in the resv. bottom. A screw driver poke fixes it fast.............instant noise and speed fix.......
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2013, 04:38 PM
shadetreelawns's Avatar
shadetreelawns shadetreelawns is online now
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montgomery AL
Posts: 118
I have run both. Last week I purchased a new navigator. I did not like the controls of the older ones. I have always run walkers and still run a MBK with a mulch deck. In my opinion walker cuts better but navigator has been better for cleanups. The nav speed is better cut wet grass better. Less maintenance and with workers running my equipment the exmark fit me better. Also my walker dealers service is less than par and turn around is very slow and not very knowledgable. Exmark dealer is top notch and has very quick turn around and have demos if it's down more than a few days. That help me make my decision.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2013, 05:21 PM
shadetreelawns's Avatar
shadetreelawns shadetreelawns is online now
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montgomery AL
Posts: 118
Another thought is the 1/4 inch height adjustment with the navigator.
__________________
Walker Mower
Exmark commercial 30
Stihl trimmers and blowers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Page generated in 0.07712 seconds with 7 queries