Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
View Poll Results: What do you think
This lawn is beautiful 4 19.05%
This lawn is weedy 9 42.86%
My clients want a lawn like this 2 9.52%
My clients would fire me for this lawn 6 28.57%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-10-2003, 08:20 PM
mower_babe's Avatar
mower_babe mower_babe is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally posted by lawn_angel
I was thinking about starting a little lawn mowing business. What are the minimum supplies you need and how do you start?
GO to just starting in business forum... more helpful than here.



Quote:
Originally posted by lawn_angel
Oh, and do I need to worry about mr. tax man?
Be afraid, be very afraid.
__________________
"They say I'm crazy, but I have a good time...life's been good to me so far..."
j.w.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"...what would I do without these jerks anyway - besides, all my friends are here."

d.h.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-14-2003, 01:08 PM
Dchall_San_Antonio Dchall_San_Antonio is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally posted by dan deutekom
The point is that if I have to build a lawn care business I have to provide a product my clients want. The pole shows that the majority of our clients would not accept a lawn that looks like this. This picture is a promotional picture from a Halifax Lawn Care Company http://edmonds.ns.ca/lawncare/lawncare.php. Now I have nothing against organics, or synthetics but I do know that if almost 70% of the population do not find this to be an acceptable lawn then I am not going to have an easy time building a profitable business. The only way that organics can become a viable profitable business is to find a way to deliver what the client expects at a reasonable cost. Otherwise it will always be a fringe element. I always hear that we have to educate the client......... NO. That won't work. We have to give the client what they want. A green, weed free GRASS lawn. Most of them really don't care how it is done.
I don't understand why folks visit forums to post points and opinions that are in direct conflict with the premise of the forum. The only folks I've seen doing this are tree huggers and animal rights advocates when they are protesting a site with their spam. If there are facts in question, then that's one thing, but this is pure opinion about clover in a lawn. What is the value of searching the Internet for arguments to support an anti organic opinion for presentation to an antagonistic audience?

This forum is a place to discuss ways to make organic programs work, not to change peoples' opinions.

As long as I'm looking to make lemonade out of this thread, that Edmonds lawncare site is wonderful! Too bad Dan didn't mention that the picture he started with with was an 'after' picture of a before and after set. The 'before' picture is posted on that Edmonds site. The point of the picture set is to show how clover can be integrated into a turf to give a uniform appearance rather than the typical clover clumping appearance. I had never seen anything like that before. And I too did not recognize the clover in the picture at the top of this thread. It is readily apparent as clumps in the 'before' picture. If Dan had posted both pictures, explained the differences to those who could not see the clover in the 'after' pic, and then asked which one you prefer, I think the poll would be different. Too late for that, now.

I agree with Dan that organic turf management will be a fringe element for quite a long while. And in the mean time, this forum will put a group of grounds keepers ahead of the learning curve as to how to use the products.

We are not trying to twist the arms of synthetic oriented clients to change to an organic program. That is not at all what I'm trying to help with. When I talk about educating the clients, I'm talking about giving them the basics of your company's organic program so they know what to expect and when. It can be disconcerting to a customer to see every single neighbor putting out insecticide on the same weekend and you're not. But you have a reason not to, so they need to know that what you're doing is being done on purpose. That's the education I'm talking about.

One of the purposes of this forum is to discover the way to make the cost more reasonable. I believe the cost of commercially labeled organic fertilizers is outrageous. In some states, it appears the definitions of fertilizers will necessitate the use of those expensive labeled ferts. In some other states, corn meal, alfalfa, and coffee grounds seem to fall outside the state fertilizer definition leaving those as options for use in an unregulated way. I believe there should be some control over using them properly, but I'm afraid to insist on it. I can see the use of ordinary corn meal falling into a regulated state and never getting out again.
__________________
David Hall
San Antonio, TX
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-14-2003, 06:55 PM
dan deutekom's Avatar
dan deutekom dan deutekom is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Millbrook, Ontario
Posts: 424
I think that you miss my point. I did not show the clumps of clover because that was definitely unacceptable. But an even dispersal of clover is? Let us change the species clover in the first picture to plantain or dandelion or knot-weed. Would it then be acceptable to have it evenly dispersed throughout the lawn.

I manage my lawns using every tool that is available. I dethatch, aerate and top dress. I use organics where I find them practical. I use many beneficial insects for pest control on my ornamental plantings where it makes sense, and I use the least toxic material for the desired effects. Unfortunately it seems that organics are an either/or proposition and that includes this forum. In my neck of the woods synthetics are being made illegal in the next year. These laws are passed by people with absolutely no knowledge of horticulture. I find it frustrating that all of the research on synthetics is discredited by the organic fringe.

I agree one of the reasons for this forum is to make costs more reasonable but until someone can change existing laws and economics that probably won't happen.

I think the main thing that bothers me about the organic movement is that if it is synthetic it is "BAD". A lot of the organic solutions arn't great for the environment either and they arn't even tested in most cases.

I think we have discussed corn, corn meal and corn gluten meal in great length. I have also tried it. My non scientific opinion is that for me it is:

1: expensive and bulky to apply
2: timing is everything for it to have any sort of control of weeds (unfortunately there are not enough hours in the day to apply this material in the right timing on my lawns)
3: does nothing to eliminate existing weeds
4: has not shown to me any noticeable decrease in fungus problems
5: as a fertilizer it is slow to react

I am not adverse to organics (heck I am right now in the process off spreading and mixing 40 yards of mushroom compost into my annual beds) but I will still use my Liquid 20-20-20 every two weeks in the summer to really make them grow.

Keep up the good discussions and I will probably keep being a thorn in your sides while I learn something new. My mind is open

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:08 PM
dvmcmrhp52's Avatar
dvmcmrhp52 dvmcmrhp52 is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pa.
Posts: 4,211
Good post David.
Dan It is good to hear that you have an open mind,Keep it that way........As for the thorns......Use as few as possible please.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:15 PM
Green in Idaho Green in Idaho is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 833
San this is not argue with your points but to point some things out that i notice, since I'm killing time before the news comes on.


[QUOTE]Originally posted by dan deutekom
[B]I think that you miss my point. I did not show the clumps of clover because that was definitely unacceptable. But an even dispersal of clover is?

1) One man's weed is another flower. What is unacceptable to you and others IS acceptable to some. It's even more acceptable to more when they learn clover puts nitrogen back into the soil and it's easy to keep green. Personally the main thing I don't like about clover is the bees and the potential of stepping on one. A full lawn of clover and even in bloom makes me think of a meadow of flowers. Part of organics is accpeting inperfection and getting away from homogenous stands.



Let us change the species clover in the first picture to plantain or dandelion or knot-weed.
2) I would not mind an area of full of dandelions for the profuse yellow flowers. I don't have one, but if my yard was big enough I might. But more importantly the clover IS a desirable for the nitrogen aspect of it.



I manage my lawns using every tool that is available. I dethatch, aerate and top dress. I use organics where I find them practical. I use many beneficial insects for pest control on my ornamental plantings where it makes sense, and I use the least toxic material for the desired effects. Unfortunately it seems that organics are an either/or proposition and that includes this forum.
3) Intergrated Pest Management.
4) There have already been several threads discussing a hybrid of organics and chemicals when necessary.


In my neck of the woods synthetics are being made illegal in the next year. ....but until someone can change existing laws

5) Your OWN post says laws are changing. Everywhere, and in every state there is a trend of a flow against "commercial lawn care".
-Florida bans yard waste in landfills-
-California cities ban noisy backpack blowers
and the list goes on.

The changing laws are simply FORCING operators to change their ways. Just like laws are forcing corporate CEOs to change their ways. When an industry does not govern and direct themselves, the legislators find it necessary to do so.

As the laws continue to force lawn biz to change the economy of scale will change and the economics will continue to make it feasible and profitable.


I think the main thing that bothers me about the organic movement is that if it is synthetic it is "BAD". A lot of the organic solutions arn't great for the environment either and they arn't even tested in most cases.
6) Such as....



I think we have discussed corn, corn meal and corn gluten meal in great length. I have also tried it. My non scientific opinion is that for me it is:

: expensive and bulky to apply
: timing is everything for it to have any sort of control of weeds (unfortunately there are not enough hours in the day to apply this material in the right timing on my lawns)

7) SAME as any preemerent
: does nothing to eliminate existing weeds
8) SAME as other prem

: has not shown to me any noticeable decrease in fungus problems
: as a fertilizer it is slow to react
9) that is a GOOD thing for many and how could you notice anti-fungul qualities IF you don't have fungus in your lawns?

I am not adverse to organics (heck I am right now in the process off spreading and mixing 40 yards of mushroom compost into my annual beds) but I will still use my Liquid 20-20-20 every two weeks in the summer to really make them grow.
10) Miracle Grow????

How about using a test plot for your annuals?
While mixing in the compost add some rock phosphate to one bed and then use it as test for organics and then at the end of next year you will have more first-hand results.

It's a progression and working towards a goal. It's certainly not black and white....
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:30 PM
GarPA GarPA is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 2,578
Woodycrest...I agree.
I took over 2 crappy commercial lawns this year. The yahoo who was mowing it last year would show up when he felt like it, and scalp it. SO when we took it over it was thin, weedy, anemic.

Regular weekly mowing at 3.75 inches. THey have received no fert or chemicals at all this season. They now look healthy and thicker, with a few weeds...but not many.

I said sometime ago on this subject that some of the healthiest turf I see is on some public soccer fields and baseball fields where I walk my dog. These get ZERo chemicals and never have fungus, when many other lawns do. Stay greener in heat/drought. I still say that mother nature has a way of taking care of herself with a little help in the form of regular mulch mowing . Call me misinformed, but I know what I've observed over the past few years.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-15-2003, 12:42 AM
Johnny Johnny is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hebron, KY
Posts: 104
Everyone needs to read this...

http://www.richsoil.com//lawn/
__________________
John Rapp

Invent The Future,
Don't Predict It
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-17-2003, 07:56 PM
lost mountain lost mountain is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 92
Dchall_San_Antonio: "I can see the use of ordinary corn meal falling into a regulated state and never getting out again."

Sounds like vitamins and the FDA doesn't it?

Re: Overseeding clover... I was visiting my inlaws in Norway for a couple of weeks this past July and talking with my mother-in-law about their lawn. She showed me the bag of grass seed they used and it was a mix of Ryegrass and Red Clover. This is the common seed blend used on lawns in Norway as it turns out.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-22-2003, 08:18 PM
A1 Grass's Avatar
A1 Grass A1 Grass is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 330
I like this thread.

Say, what do you guys think of this lawn?
Attached Images
 
__________________
A1-Grass - High Quality Lawn Service

There is unrest in the Forest, there is trouble with the Trees
for the Maples want more sunlight and the Oaks ignore their pleas..
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-22-2003, 08:41 PM
dan deutekom's Avatar
dan deutekom dan deutekom is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Millbrook, Ontario
Posts: 424
The lawn looks great but the house looks like it had a little to much synthetic building material
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Page generated in 0.13804 seconds with 9 queries