Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2004, 06:58 PM
NCYARDBOY's Avatar
NCYARDBOY NCYARDBOY is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: concord, nc
Posts: 13
kohler? or kawasaki?

I know this has probably been brought up before, BUT, do I want a mower with a Kohler engine, OR Kawasaki engine? AND WHY?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2004, 07:36 PM
vadeere vadeere is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 245
Do you want a ford or a chevy? It is all up to you. Kohlers are cheaper on average. They also tend to be a little cold natured. I have a kohler 15 on a metro and kohler 23 on a toro z master. I love both. They run great and start easy. So the descision is up to you. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2004, 07:51 PM
grass_cuttin_fool's Avatar
grass_cuttin_fool grass_cuttin_fool is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,505
my personel preference is a kawasaki on 17 hp or less because the kohler is a single cylinder and the kawa is a 2 cyl. The 2 cyl seems to have better torque.I have a 20hp 2 cyc on my tiger cub and it does fine. Both are good engines
__________________
To my dad, Thanx Pops you are my dad, my brother , and my best friend



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2004, 10:09 PM
Travis Followell's Avatar
Travis Followell Travis Followell is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 2,207
Kohler engines all the way. They are american made so parts will be a lot easier to get and also a lot cheaper and there have been so many problems with the Kawasaki engines- surging, carb problems, upper crankshaft seals blowing which eventually results in an engine failure at low hours. If it don't have a Kohler engine on it we don't buy it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:34 PM
MBDiagMan MBDiagMan is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 669
I remember reading something that led me to believe that the Kawasaki engines, or maybe just some of them, have a plastic cam gear that needs to be watched.

Please tell me this isn't so! I do not own a Kawasake mower engine, but I see them being sold as a premium piece. With the timing chain/gears being SOOOooooo critical, I can't imagine this being true.

Anyone know anything about this?

Have a great day,
Doc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:47 PM
grass_cuttin_fool's Avatar
grass_cuttin_fool grass_cuttin_fool is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,505
There was a thread last winter and some one had to replace the plastic gears but they had 4-6 thousand hours on it best I remember. Also as they wear I would rather have some soft plastic in the crank case rather than some metal floating around until oil change time
__________________
To my dad, Thanx Pops you are my dad, my brother , and my best friend



Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:56 PM
MBDiagMan MBDiagMan is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 669
Yes, having plastic in the crankcase beats metal shavings, but aren't these interference engines? If they are, losing the timing system would cause serious engine damage.

That said, since your experience is 4000 to 6000 hours, I think I would replace them at about 3000 hours. They can't be that difficult to replace. Sounds like good preventive maintenance to me.

Have a great day,
Doc
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2004, 01:40 AM
Mikes Machines's Avatar
Mikes Machines Mikes Machines is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 112
Do you know how long 6000 hours is? At 40 hours a week times 52 weeks a year thats 2080 hours a year. Thats 3 years at 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. I think the whole piece of equipment would be worn out before the motor lets go. I dont think the plastic gear thing is a concern.

The parts for the Kohler are a little bit cheaper. I think the Kawasakis are a bit smoother running. Very close call. You wont go wrong with either.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-30-2004, 10:15 AM
MBDiagMan MBDiagMan is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 669
All I'm saying is that with a given history of this inexpensive, but highly crucial part, failing at a given number of hours, replacing it BEFORE it fails would potentially save big bucks. If you were to let it fail, it would hand grenade the entire engine. "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."

If these machines are worn out at 3,000 hours, why bother putting a premium engine in them to begin with?

Have a great day,
Doc
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-30-2004, 05:32 PM
Travis Followell's Avatar
Travis Followell Travis Followell is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 2,207
I have heard of some liquid cooled Kawasaki engines with 7000 hrs without any problems but i'm not sure if they have the plastic or metal cam in them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.09107 seconds with 7 queries