Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2005, 08:50 AM
wpines wpines is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: woodbury ct
Posts: 54
Front deck mowers

Has anyone used switched form a mid mount to a front mount? Why?
Do they handle hills obstacles or uneven terrain better? Do they ride better?
Is ease of maintenance that big of an issue?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2005, 09:16 AM
rodfather's Avatar
rodfather rodfather is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clinton, NJ
Posts: 9,632
We have both. I personally prefer the front mount due the fact it holds slopes better and can get under low growing tree limbs and bushes much better IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2005, 10:51 AM
ScCo ScCo is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 251
we have both walkers (front decks) and hustler super z's.

The hustlers make short work of the slopes that the walker won't stick across (walker will sometimes go up and down these steeper slopes). I've demoed pretty much all of the "major" manufacturer's machines and the super z is what I have been able to get to hold slopes the best.

In the area of cut quality, the walker is absolutely the cleanest cutting machine I have ever used. The outfront deck reaches under and around things very nicely, as rodfather mentioned above. It is all but impossible to scalp with the walker whereas with the midmounts I can't cut below 2.5" without having major scalping issues. Many of our properties are tifway bermuda that are irrigated, fertilized, and very thick. The walkers rule on these properties because they allow us to cut at the heights that tifway is supposed to be cut at without scalping or an unsightly finished cut.

If you don't ever need to cut below 3" and you don't have a lot of trees and overhangs that you need the cutting deck to fit under, then the midmount machines are probably more along the lines of what you will prefer.

Shorter cutting heights, more meticulously designed properties tend to favor the front deck machines in a big way.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2005, 01:33 PM
Aaron Marshall's Avatar
Aaron Marshall Aaron Marshall is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 136
I've had a Husky zero turn mid mount, and I know own a walker. There are advantages to both. In the area I am in now the walker works perfect. I just stay away from the areas where I know a big z would do better and I let them take care of it. And as ScCo said above, the mid mounts below 3" unless it is absolutly flat, you will get scalping from what I have experienced. No such thing with the walker. Good luck to ya.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2005, 02:16 PM
apexlawn03 apexlawn03 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate N.Y. Southern teir
Posts: 105
turf ranger 1992

Hello I have a 1992 exmark turf ranger 60 inch cut and it is my work horse mower. There are 4 large LCO's in my area and most use zt and wb. I mow partime about 20 lawns per week some big and some small. I use the turf ranger at everyone that I can. 60 inch deck goes under and around areas well. Average ground speed probably 3 to 5. New exmarks have a deeper deck than my old one. Have used it on hills and inclines without much problem. It takes a little time to learn when and were it wont go. Speed not as good as z turn but its a work horse. Iam looking forward to testing out a new one this summer with the deeper improved deck and more horse power. Mine has the 18hp kohler.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2005, 02:27 PM
David Grass David Grass is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 484
The out front decks are considered a more "pro" cut, because the deck mows the grass BEFORE it is run over (save the small caster wheels), whereas, a tractor style mower, typically MASHES the grass down a lot more, then the deck mows it. Later that day, when the grass is standing more, or a day later the difference is even more apparent. then, of course, what everyone else said above.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Page generated in 0.07627 seconds with 7 queries