Separate names with a comma.
Missed the live Ask the Expert event?
Not to worry. Check out the archived thread of the Q&A with Ken Hutcheson, President of U.S. Lawns, and the LawnSite community in the Franchising forum .
Discussion in 'Lawn Mowing' started by coronelli, Dec 3, 2006.
From what little I know there are some trade offs with both.
I think 4 stroke is the way of the future. They are much quieter with more power. All the nutty small towns that want to ban blowers will probably start with a noise ordinance that the average 4stroke can pass but an equal 2 stroke cant.
My 4 stroke blower runs just fine. I don't have a problem embracing new technologies like some other people here at Lawnsite do.
2-stroke Extremly powerful for its weight reach higher rpm's with no problem. Less parts, simpler consept. However larger engines have cooling problems. Thats why you only see v-6 and v-8 2 strokes in boats. Unfortantly they do burn oil. . .
4-stroke. Alot of torque. Alot cleaner burning. Quiter then a 2-storke. However they are very heavy. There are alot of parts with them and alto that can go wrong.
CORRECT!!!!!! couldnt have said it better myself.....
I love my 2-cycle engines because they take so little maintainence, just occasional air/fuel filter and sparkplug changes. No valves, etc. to deal with. For this reason I've decided to get 2-cycle as long as I can.
However, I'd have no problem switching to 4-cycle if the EPA bans 2-cycle. 4-cycle are certainly cleaner and have a much more pleasant exhaust sound.