Front deck vs. Belly deck

Discussion in 'Lawn Mowing' started by pikefool, Oct 28, 2004.

  1. pikefool

    pikefool LawnSite Member
    Posts: 2

    which is better, a front deck or a belly deck and why? :)
  2. out4now

    out4now LawnSite Bronze Member
    from AZ
    Posts: 1,796

    Front decks are better where you have lots of 90 degree corners. Walker is good for these situations. Midmounts though have a speed advantage. Depends on properties you are doing.
  3. PLM-1

    PLM-1 LawnSite Bronze Member
    Posts: 1,640

    I like front decks. Better view, trimability and the blades and the top and bottom of the deck are easier to service.
  4. Doster's L & L

    Doster's L & L LawnSite Senior Member
    Posts: 616

    Front decks are at a disadvantage because the 2 front wheels seem to hit dips in lawns and if they're deep enough, they'll cause a circular scalp from the blade. Mid mounts on the other hand, especially exmark which is what i use, will float right over the hole. If ALL of your lawns are perfectly smooth and you had alot of low lying branches to get up under, i think the front deck is the way to go. If you do look into getting a front deck, i DO NOT recommend Woods. You'll see more down time than you could possibly imagine! (This my friend, is not an opinion.) Personally, l like Exmark.
  5. PLM-1

    PLM-1 LawnSite Bronze Member
    Posts: 1,640

    the same thing happens with a midmount. but if they are deep enough the midmounts just get stuck! e.g. mowing around ponds. F/M's are the way to go...if exmark made one everyone would have one...
  6. Doster's L & L

    Doster's L & L LawnSite Senior Member
    Posts: 616

    "but if they are deep enough the midmounts just get stuck!"

    That's funny... If ANY hole is deep enough, ANYTHING will get stuck. I'm talking about a hole that is about 1' in diameter about 6" deep. If you are striping with a front deck and that front tire hits the hole, you're GONNA have a circular blade scalp. I mow around a few ponds myself... i have no trouble with the mid mounts. I have mowed the same ponds with the Woods f/m, there is no advantage or disadvantage with either one of them near ponds.

    The only advantage with the F/M is around low lying lilmbs and cemetarys around stones. The other stuff... Mid Mounts are the way to go. BTW, make sure the 2 front tires are stationary and are not able to pivot in the center. Example: Kubota. I like Kubota.... Very dependable! l own one of those too, which is a M/M, but the front axle pivots in the center. When one of the 2 tires hit a hole, it will also want to scalp a bit, but NOT NEARLY as bad as a Front Deck mower.

    Joplin, im just curious. I know that Grasshopper makes the Woods mowers. I had to take my Woods mower to the shop ALL the TIME!! Sometimes l took it to get fixed more than once a day on a number of occasions. How is your grasshopper holding up? Do you have good luck with it being dependable? I know there was a redesign in their machines a few years ago. I had the 97-98 model and AB SO LUTE LY HATED the thing!! Just curious if any improvements have been made. Thanks!
  7. rodfather

    rodfather LawnSite Fanatic
    Posts: 9,501

    Front decks...less hand trimming needed and better visibility. Easier to service as well.
  8. Nick911Racing

    Nick911Racing LawnSite Member
    Posts: 13

    Front mounts are a 100 times easier to service in every aspect; deck, blades, motor, etc. The disadvantages are to change deck height for the kubota and deere you must remove the front castors and change the spacers. In the back pins need to be moved and you manually have to lift the deck to do it. One other disadvantage is wheelbase/length, which are significantly longer. The midmount deck mowers I find are usually extremely difficult to service since you must remove a lot of things to get to what your servicing. It is a heck of a lot easier to change deck height however and the groundspeed is usually higher than that of the frontmounts. I personally have found however that the front mount scalps a lot less than the midmount because on a front mount castors and wheels are closer to the deck and the deck is independant of the chassis so there is less span between the front and back of the deck which reduces scalping.

    Thats my two cents.
  9. fcl01

    fcl01 LawnSite Member
    from OHIO
    Posts: 249

    i think that both have their goods/bads. ive never had a walker, but the grasshopper and steiner are great mowers. but theres a couple things against them, overall size and weight is a big factor. people buy z's for manuverability. the longer the overall length is, the more limited you are on where you can just whip it around. plus, once a steiner or a hopper is stuck, you better have a tractor or something to unstick it. they are extremely heavy and since they pivot at the deck, one end or another is always gonna hang up.
    but they mow like theres no tommorrow!
    whichever you get, i think youll be happy :D
    in short, buy whichever good brand is the most comfortable to you. youre the one who has to sit on it all day. :waving:
  10. walker-talker

    walker-talker LawnSite Platinum Member
    from Midwest
    Posts: 4,771

    Rumor has it that Exmark is coming out with a front deck next year and is suppose to be on display at the GIE. I would buy one in a heartbeat if it cuts anything like their other mowers. The blade tip speed seems to be faster than the Walker. Don't get me wrong...I love my Walker, but since I already have one, then I would go with the Exmark. I love the front deck design and here, speed is not really an issue. Most lots are 5K to 10K.

Share This Page