GroundTec Inc equipment / work 2010

Discussion in 'Original Pictures Forum' started by gtec, Aug 23, 2010.

  1. jeffslawnservice

    jeffslawnservice LawnSite Senior Member
    Posts: 830

    Work looks good. I saw your trucks a few times back in the fall up around Street Road and York Road when I was on my way back from class.
     
  2. gtec

    gtec LawnSite Member
    Posts: 28

    some late 2011 season pics. first is a before and after of a cleaning / repair job. Its amazing how many times we pull apart a landing to find the previous contractor failed to install waterproofing of any sort. :hammerhead:

    IMAG0127.jpg

    IMAG0230.jpg

    IMAG0128.jpg

    IMAG0225.jpg
     
  3. gtec

    gtec LawnSite Member
    Posts: 28

    and a few pics of a late 2011 patio project before final grading and seeding could be done.

    IMAG0450.jpg

    IMAG0451.jpg

    IMAG0452.jpg

    IMAG0453.jpg
     
  4. gtec

    gtec LawnSite Member
    Posts: 28

    figured I'd add this pic too.. in case anyone had doubts that a VTS system DOES put more stress on the rear wheel motors.. well, it sheared all 8 studs off right at the hub. Although I do firmly believe that our VTS system is cursed considering we've replaced (2) torsion tubes, split bogeys, idlers, as well as repaired stress cracks in the tunnels.

    IMG_0301.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2012
  5. APLUS LAWN CARE

    APLUS LAWN CARE LawnSite Senior Member
    Male, from North Missouri
    Posts: 587

    Your work pictures look really good! You have nice equipment as well!
     
  6. LawnMan19

    LawnMan19 LawnSite Gold Member
    Posts: 3,284

    Everything looks great as usual, and that sucks about the VTS system.
     
  7. newtostone

    newtostone LawnSite Senior Member
    from NY
    Posts: 681

    When the vts is working how do you feel it compares to a normal track machine/wheeled machine. Also did you buy the vts new?
     
  8. gtec

    gtec LawnSite Member
    Posts: 28

    I bought the tracks used (barely) through a CAT dealer in Louisiana. As far as a review, I feel as though the VTS is a necessary evil. I would not want to have a dedicated track machine for snow use, so having that option to remove the tracks for the winter is invaluable. The 232 is a little underpowered for the system and you can feel it with only 56hp. As many problems as I've had with the system I would not hesitate to buy these for our next machine. They are a very open design making them good at self cleaning, you'll lose less production time due to rain/mud, and we are into a "tracked" machine for much less than it would have cost to buy a dedicated track machine with the added bonus of wearing out a $400 set of tires instead of $2000 worth of tracks during the winter.
     
  9. LawnMan19

    LawnMan19 LawnSite Gold Member
    Posts: 3,284

    I think this is a very true review from what I have heard from others, very good review.:clapping:
     
  10. S-205

    S-205 LawnSite Bronze Member
    from Ontario
    Posts: 1,296

    Yeah I wondered if that was ETW's cummins as well?
     

Share This Page