Sorry but ASV's just look ********

Discussion in 'Heavy Equipment & Pavement' started by jmbobcat2, Apr 4, 2006.

  1. jmbobcat2

    jmbobcat2 LawnSite Member
    Posts: 9

    They need to tighten it up a little and fix those stubby arms - what the heck.
     
  2. Tigerotor77W

    Tigerotor77W LawnSite Bronze Member
    from Germany
    Posts: 1,891

    I think they are looking sharper and sharper... is there any other reason you don't like the ASV, or just because it's ugly?
     
  3. jmbobcat2

    jmbobcat2 LawnSite Member
    Posts: 9

    I almost bought one but couldnt get over it. I find myself snickering whenever I see one. Smooth ride though.
     
  4. jmbobcat2

    jmbobcat2 LawnSite Member
    Posts: 9

    Also I saw one trying to load a truck and was having a heck of a time, he ended up having to buid a little ramp so he could reach to get the dirt in the back LOL.
     
  5. Scag48

    Scag48 LawnSite Fanatic
    Posts: 6,068

    I've noticed their reach has been diminished by alot. Really a shame. ASV markets their machines as miniature bulldozers and have since the PosiTrak days. I think you'd be better off with a different machine if you did alot of truck loading.
     
  6. Digdeep

    Digdeep LawnSite Bronze Member
    Posts: 1,840

    I'd agree with you that someone could argue that the ASV machines don't look as refined as some of the other manufacturers, but I'd also argue that they aren't the worst either. As far as loading trucks goes, I've never had a problem loading with my RC50. I think it has 24" of reach. Not the longest reach out there, but good enough to get the job done without any issues. It's far more productive and flexible with the applications that I can bid than the Bobcat machines. It pushes like no tomorrow, can operate on paved surfaces without problem, is lighter on sensitive surfaces like grass, is faster, doesn't get stuck as easy, climbs better, side slopes better, is far superior in snow removal than other tracked machines near the same size, and doesn't beat the s#*t out of me aver a full day in the seat. The new machines also look much "nicer" and may have one of the ncest cabs in the industry now. I'd bet that all of the other models will be changing over to look like the two new ones very soon.
     
  7. ksss

    ksss LawnSite Fanatic
    Posts: 7,126

    I think Vermeer made a point in another thread that the ASV is designed as a loader first not a tool carrier. With that in mind it is easier to see why it looks like it does. I agree, they are ugly but I guess even ugly has a purpose. Also with 24" of reach you can't be dumping into the center of a typical tandem dump truck.
     
  8. Yard Solutions

    Yard Solutions LawnSite Member
    Posts: 23

    I'm personaly afraid the neighbors will think I'm crazy if I brough one home. My question is, if it's ment to load, why such the small (low profile) bucket? I know they make a large capacity, but its only longer, not "higher"
     
  9. Digdeep

    Digdeep LawnSite Bronze Member
    Posts: 1,840

    I don't have a real problem loading trucks. It just takes a little flick of the bucket to flop the load into the middle of the truck. It definitely outloads my S220 by a huge margin. The Virnig bucket that is standard with the machine actually holds a little more dirt than the CAT 247 66" bucket because it has a deep and high backboard.
     
  10. jmbobcat2

    jmbobcat2 LawnSite Member
    Posts: 9

    You would think it wouldn't be all that difficult to engineer some longer arms on them to get the bucket higher, wonder what the thinking was over there, this isn't rocket science. What good is a loader if it can't load well. I am sure it probably would make a good plow.
     

Share This Page