w/b vs. rider in productvity

Discussion in 'Lawn Mowing' started by ffemt1271, Jun 23, 2003.

  1. ffemt1271

    ffemt1271 LawnSite Bronze Member
    Posts: 1,285

    how much productive would a 48" exmark lazer be than a 48" exmark metro hp? seems the rider mows faster? wanting input for those of you who have used both----
    THANKS
     
  2. BSDeality

    BSDeality LawnSite Silver Member
    Posts: 2,849

    hasn't this been beaten to death with a stick yet?

    each machine will out perform the other in seperate areas.

    a walker is a better choice for hills
    a ztr is a better choice for wide open flats.
     
  3. John Gamba

    John Gamba LawnSite Fanatic
    from ct
    Posts: 10,812

    I Think The rider Will have More HP, So you Can Mow Faster.
    John
     
  4. tiedeman

    tiedeman LawnSite Fanatic
    from earth
    Posts: 8,745

    it all comes back to the situation and the operator
     
  5. madmow

    madmow LawnSite Member
    Posts: 44

    I personally feel that a w/b makes a nicer cut, but takes longer.
     
  6. brucec32

    brucec32 LawnSite Platinum Member
    Posts: 4,403

    Depends on the type lawns and grass. I have recently had to mow with a 44" belt drive and velke while my 48" lazer was in the shop. I have consistently been beating my time on site by about 5 minutes/lawn on small/medium properties. The faster turning and ability to take curves around obstacles faster seems to be the key. Of course my legs hurt more at night now.

    I would still never sell the ZTR. Fatigue is a factor out there.
     
  7. TJLC

    TJLC LawnSite Bronze Member
    Posts: 1,308

    I have owned both and I feel, IMHO, it depends on YOUR particular situation. For ME a w/b with sulky works best. If I had nothing but open areas I think I would prefer the Z. Unfortunately I mow alot of slopes, so like I said overall a w/b works best for ME.
     

Share This Page