Separate names with a comma.
Missed the live Ask the Expert event?
Not to worry. Check out the archived thread of the Q&A with Ken Hutcheson, President of U.S. Lawns, and the LawnSite community in the Franchising forum .
Discussion in 'Industry Surveys & Polls' started by DillonsLawnCare, Jul 26, 2007.
which mower do you think it better????????
zero turn rider
Both have advatanges and disadvantages.
Ya, i agree with Supper Grassy, they both got their pros and cons
I agree, depending on the sizes and conditions of your properties, some may be better then others.
I drove a zero turn for a while, and now I have a walk behind. i love them both, but prefer the walk behind as it is more maneuverable and better on slopes. However, I do miss sittin on my ass.
I feel that to be effective I must have both. In saying that though, I think having a 52 walkbehind and a 52 Z would not be as efficient say as a 36 or 48 walk behind and a 60-72 rider. I think it really depends on the properties.
Me too on all posts -- especially gavin478.
Both have their place - I own one of each and think that is the most efficient. A 36" walk behind and a 60" ZTR fit the bill fine for me.
Zero turn rider.
I had a walkbehind with Velike but, figured what is the use of standing when you can sit on your butt and do the same thing with a zero turn rider.