How bout it. I am ready to buy probably one of the two: hanna or kelway. Being accurate as well as easy to use is important. But I defer to you all. It is for Ph. results.
I said on the spot results too....In the past, I have used a Kelway with good results, working for a company with a more chemical approach.I didn't say spot results but results on the spot. That means I can know right then and there what the P.H. is. There is nothing wrong with that. It is one of several observations to learn a little about the soil condition. I do plenty of soil tests that I send in and tests which include the P.H. but I am confident with a good soil tester I can know the P.H..I am not confident in studying the soil to know the nutrient or organic matter content.
And so,at a N.O.F.A. seminar someone highly suggested the Hanna soil tester and another organic head the Kelway. So I ask,what do you out there who use soil testers,what is your opinion who might have had experience with the above two mentioned.
I hope that explains it.
Seriously? a field reading tells me an absolute boat loadI believe the important thing to remember is you cannot make any management decisions with a pH value alone. Pretty much all they are good for in the field is an indicator telling you if further testing is needed or not.
No, it doesn't....I think that's the point Growing, Kiril and I have tried to make in this thread.Seriously? a field reading tells me an absolute boat load
Wow thats a pretty arrogant statement to someone sitting on Martha's vineyard from a guy in Lancaster, care to share with me some other valuable information you feel I need to know?No, it doesn't....I think that's the point Growing, Kiril and I have tried to make in this thread.
Now you lost me .... something going on with you and natty?Wow thats a pretty arrogant statement to someone sitting on Martha's vineyard from a guy in Lancaster, care to share with me some other valuable information you feel I need to know?
Ya, I got lost hear to when natty attempted to tell me what a ph reading hear on Martha's vineyard tells me nothing more than I need more testing. A coastal land with hundreds of sea shell drives and irrigated property's. With world class turf. This is typical of lawnsite, I am not saying additional testing is not needed I am saying a ph reading hear with known historical data on soil condition tells me more of whats going on than just a ph reading a lot more. Leading questions are nothing but a ego trip seriously no one has to agree but flat out not accepting that statement says allot about someone. Do you have time for this? I certainly don'tNow you lost me .... something going on with you and natty?
Short of mapping variations in soil pH over an area, which is well beyond what most anyone will do here and is not really necessary for landscapes, the value of a field measured pH is limited.
Perhaps if you explained what immediately actionable information a field measured pH provides ................
Still not following you.Ya, I got lost hear to when natty attempted to tell me what a ph reading hear on Martha's vineyard tells me nothing more than I need more testing. A coastal land with hundreds of sea shell drives and irrigated property's. With world class turf. This is typical of lawnsite, I am not saying additional testing is not needed I am saying a ph reading hear with known historical data on soil condition tells me more of whats going on than just a ph reading a lot more. Leading questions are nothing but a ego trip seriously no one has to agree but flat out not accepting that statement says allot about someone. Do you have time for this? I certainly don't