Talking about blade numbers in general. Would two a bladed deck work better than a three bladed deck? Let's say a 36" to 42" deck range and this would be a do all mower, weekly mows, by weekly with the occasional over grown clean up.
That is true about BTS all else being equal, but in the last decade or so, all mowers of commercial quality have their deck and pto pulleys designed to spin the blade tips at the same 18-18.5K FPM, so that would be awash there now. IME, 3 blades hitting the clippings on their way out makes for smaller clippings and also a cleaner finish left behind. How well a deck cuts has more to do with the deck's design than the number of blades IME.Longer blades will have faster speed at the tips if they are spinning at the same RPMs as a shorter blade. I don't know if this is the reason why but in my experience our machines with 24" blades are the best mulchers.
Is anyone familiar enough with the maths on this topic to tell me if the difference in RPMs to maintain the same blade tip speed is proportional to the difference in blade length?That is true about BTS all else being equal, but in the last decade or so, all mowers of commercial quality have their deck and pto pulleys designed to spin the blade tips at the same 18-18.5K FPM, so that would be awash there now. IME, 3 blades hitting the clippings on their way out makes for smaller clippings and also a cleaner finish left behind. How well a deck cuts has more to do with the deck's design than the number of blades IME.
Figure the circumference c=pi • diameterIs anyone familiar enough with the maths on this topic to tell me if the difference in RPMs to maintain the same blade tip speed is proportional to the difference in blade length?
Like does a 24" blade need to spin 33% slower than a 16" blade to match blade tip speed?