Just got my Turf mag today. In the editors notes, David Cassidy proclaimed his editorial on the liberal media bias "right". I just thought it was amusing to see something that was a topic of such heated debate brought up for a second issue in a row. I have more than a sneaking suspition that Mr. Cassidy read the thread about his article here on Lawn Site. And I find it a little hard to believe there was no mention of the several posters here who disagreed with his opinion. Since a thread from LawnSite is always used in Turf Magazine. Maybe the thread where Mr. Cassidys article was a topic of such debate should be used, to show the differences in opinion on the article, as opposed to just proclaiming himself"right". I enjoy my subscription to Turf, and plan on being a continued reader. I also respect Mr. Cassidys opinion, and his right to post his opinions in his magazine. However when someone writes that their opinion is true or "right", as opposed to just stating their opinion. That is exactly what leads to a media bias one way or the other. At any rate, since in this issues article, Mr. Cassidy said no one wrote in and disagreed with him, or called him a right wing nut. Allow me to be the first. I disagree and Mr. Cassidy is a right wing nut. However I truly do mean that in the nicest possible way. After all my difference of opinion keeps me reading Mr. Cassidys articles. And keeping people reading is the important thing. Anyway what are all of your thoughts on the follow up article in the editors notes?