Separate names with a comma.
Missed the live Ask the Expert event?
Catch up on the conversation with Ken Hutcheson, President of U.S. Lawns in the Franchising forum plus sign up to receive a FREE eBook on how to grow your landscape business.
Discussion in 'Lawn Mowing' started by Mark McC, Jan 24, 2005.
This would be for mowers used in northern Virginia. Is the Kawasaki 17 enough for a Turf Tracer 52"?
I would say that it would be enough as long as you side discharge. I have the 17hp Kaw on my 44" Lazer hp and it has plenty of power for a rider as long as I side discharge.
I got a 15hp 32", and I mostly mulch... In the wet grass I wish I had the twin cyclinder 17hp... For 52" i'd say go for a 20+hp...
I agree, low or middle 20's HP. I've used 20HP B&S on 52" Standers and it just isn't enough in the heavier and wet grass.
I voted yes but the 17 hp might slow you down in some places. You would probibly be better off to go ahead and get it with a 20 hp. It really depends on what type of yards you will be mowing and how often.
I have a 19 kawai on my 52" TT and it does just okay. If it blows up I will get at least a 22hp if not more... You can never have too much power!! You are just working the littler engines harder, I"d rather have a 22 to muscle through it all and not have it get abused doing it. Even the 19 in wet grass isn't the most pleasant.
I've got a 19 hp Kawasaki on a 48" Scag. Does pretty good, but will bog down on tall thick grass. Would not consider it on a 52.
I have the 17hp tthp. Its enough plower if your just cutting weekly. I wish I got the bigger engine and all the other options but finacially I don't think it makes sense.
Too much horsepower is almost enough!
I have 25 horsepower on my 54 walk-behind, like Oldtimer said its almost enough.