There's no way a stander with turdsaver tread pattern is going to outperform a ztr with at101s.
Which mowers specifically?Like I mentioned before in another thread, my ztr was better on hills and slopes than the same brand Standers (and I love and prefer the standers). Some have said standers are better at holding hills. I’d disagree from my own experience (whatever that’s good for).
My Exmark dealer is also the Wright dealer. Also Hustler. Been buying parts there for a couple years. They are all convinced that Stander's are superior in every way. Good people, but I've stayed suspicious. Even still.The only posts I've seen where they claim a stander is better than a ztr on slopes is that you can "abandon ship" by simple stepping off versus a ztr where you are just along for the ride.
Not yet. I'm going to try and give it a fair shake. Probably new tires, either AT101’s or VersaTurf's.Well you arent supposed to put the tires in the drink!
Are ya thinking about selling the stander now? If so I'd be interested. I need another good stander for some of my retention areas.
For sure, not as comfortable yet. Though, I can tell by the way it handles up, down, and zero-turns on that hill yesterday, that there is a marginal difference in hillside performance. Marginal. Not revolutionary as many suggest.There's a learning curve from your lazer. Maybe you aren't comfortable on it yet like you are the old tried and true lazer. You might find as you continue to use it that it does better than you originally thought on hills. Just have to get used to it.
There is the problem ^^^^the danger comes when you start pointing downhill.
This is where the ZTR loses it. Once pointed downhill, I either have to drag the uphill/inside tire, and basically slide to make the turn, or just point downhill and hang on...
I will state again I’ve never ran a stander, but I’m no stranger to equipment. I don’t see how a machine that is set up just like a ZTR can hold a hill any better. Other than operator position, there’s really no difference. Center or gravity is similar, stance is similar (depending on machine size). I would say from an evaluation standpoint, the difference is mental. Guys feel more stable standing because they can lean over. I would say most get too focused on the feel of sitting on a ZTR (get scared) and don’t focus on operating it. On a stander, they lean over, lose the fear, and keep focused on operating the machine. I’m sure someone will say I can’t say anything unless I’ve run one, but I’ll just shrug and say “ok, whatever”. It has to be mental.For sure, not as comfortable yet. Though, I can tell by the way it handles up, down, and zero-turns on that hill yesterday, that there is a marginal difference in hillside performance. Marginal. Not revolutionary as many suggest.
Go back and look at those pictures. Impossible to mow around those angled mulch beds without pointing downhill at some point.There is the problem ^^^^
Simple cure, never point down hill.
I will say that most standers are shorter overall than Z's. Which often translates to less mass in front of the drive tires. On the Wright mowers, where the engine & pumps travel with the deck, their weight moves lower too, as the cut height gets shorter. The operator gets to shift their weight around too - lean over the drive tires, or hang your butt and one leg back off the platform.I will state again I’ve never ran a stander, but I’m no stranger to equipment. I don’t see how a machine that is set up just like a ZTR can hold a hill any better. Other than operator position, there’s really no difference. Center or gravity is similar, stance is similar (depending on machine size). I would say from an evaluation standpoint, the difference is mental. Guys feel more stable standing because they can lean over. I would say most get too focused on the feel of sitting on a ZTR (get scared) and don’t focus on operating it. On a stander, they lean over, lose the fear, and keep focused on operating the machine. I’m sure someone will say I can’t say anything unless I’ve run one, but I’ll just shrug and say “ok, whatever”. It has to be mental.
noted.I will state again I’ve never ran a stander,
Similar might be a stretch. About the only similarity is that they have 2 seperate drive tires and front castors.Other than operator position, there’s really no difference. Center or gravity is similar, stance is similar (depending on machine size). I would say from an evaluation standpoint, the difference is mental.
Well you can of course say it's mental and shrug it off, but you know experience is the best way to form an opinion.Guys feel more stable standing because they can lean over. I would say most get too focused on the feel of sitting on a ZTR (get scared) and don’t focus on operating it. On a stander, they lean over, lose the fear, and keep focused on operating the machine. I’m sure someone will say I can’t say anything unless I’ve run one, but I’ll just shrug and say “ok, whatever”. It has to be mental.