<p>Guido:<p>A-1 didn't start this thread...and it doesn't matter to me what kind of technology Nilsson employs...why should it matter to you? I started this thread because the article had meaning to me. And since I extracted some benefit I felt that perhaps some LS members could benefit as well. Not all of course....a few seem to have an agenda. That's real clear now.<p>For me, out there still 'doing it' I've a tendency to fear blowing my prospects out of the water with high prices. Nilsson's article helps reinforce the notion that higher prices are possible. So, it's a personal mindset that the article addresses. Maybe for you it's something different.<p>You know what Guido, if you're mad at Phil for 'flip flopping' or whatever, I would refer to a recent post (not sure which thread) where you strongly uphold a certain posters' right to make uncensored, unedited, unpolitically correct comments. As I recall, you're the guy that went ballistic when Stone mentioned 'white slavery' as a possible labor source in the Stone Interview....am I right about that?<p>LawnGuy, you're always the first in line...rock in hand when Nilsson's name pops up..are you saying that whoever would offer up a freebie may be a crack *****? Does that apply to the new contributor to LS as well? While we are at it, would you kindly repeat your well worn axiom about consultants....thanks.<p>And who's Big Daddy? I know the Bengals signed a lineman a few years back so named...<p>Or, since you mentioned Big Daddy and crack whores in the same post, should we assume you run a cleaner stable of "ho's"? A case of self-aspiration?
