Lawn Care Forum banner

Tell me if I’m crazy

2786 Views 26 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  Doc8406
So for years everyone has said Stand on mowers are the way to go in my area. I always just blew that comment off. We run 61 inch turf tigers currently and with all the rain we’ve had these heavy mowers have been pretty rough on the turf. So I decided to demo a toro grandstand but it’s only a 52inch. I kinda hated to even take it out because I was scared it would slow us down. But man let me tell you. I haven’t actually timed it but I’m pretty sure I can cover yards just as fast or faster with it than my turf tigers. I think it’s simply the fact it turns around so much faster and can fit around everything in the lawn so much better. But is it just me or does everyone seem to think this?
1 - 2 of 27 Posts
to me turning on a stander is slower. i guess it's what you get used to. on a sit down your hands never leave the levers but on a stander you have to swap from pushing with your thumbs to pulling back with your fingers and back and forth like that when making turns. to me it made turns slower when i tried one out.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I used to think just like what you said here . However on the sit down I have to do a three point turn and still may tear the grass. This stand on I can have one tire go forward and the other go backwards and really make a zero turn with no turf damage. I can be back half way down a stripe before the sit down has turned around
it depends on how you do your turns. i do semi-3 point turns. they are much faster than a full 3 point turn. it's hard to explain.

i thought you had to do 3 point turns with standers too.

i know on a residential ztr you can do zero turns without any damage. maybe it's because of the smaller tires or becuase they weigh half as much. i'm not sure.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 2 of 27 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top