time limit

Discussion in 'Questions, Rules, Suggestions' started by Avery, Jul 11, 2004.

  1. Avery

    Avery LawnSite Bronze Member
    Messages: 1,389

    So when did we go back to 60 secs. between posts? I visit many forums about lots of different topics. This is the only one that has a time limit on posts. None of the others have problems by not using the time limit. Just curious what problems LS has that would require 60 seconds between posts. Excessive IMO. Makes me wanna cuss....and cussing is not allowed here! LOL
  2. jajwrigh

    jajwrigh LawnSite Bronze Member
    Male, from Martinsville, IN
    Messages: 1,405

    I think it should be 30 seconds or something less than 60!!
  3. CamLand

    CamLand LawnSite Bronze Member
    Messages: 1,299

    i had to wait 180 seconds today...
  4. chuckwk

    chuckwk Founder
    from KC, MO
    Messages: 629

    We have not made any changes that I know of lately .... I do remember Pierre setting a time limit so to cut down on double posts.
  5. Sean Adams

    Sean Adams LawnSite Gold Member
    Messages: 3,597

    I will have to double check with Pierre because I know we did not make any time limit changes.
  6. Avery

    Avery LawnSite Bronze Member
    Messages: 1,389

    Yep. It has changed. You were kind enough to lower it to 30 secs. for awhile. Back up to 60 now. Kinda a pain when I am trying to hammer out a few responses on my way out in the a.m. Thanks for checking!
  7. chuckwk

    chuckwk Founder
    from KC, MO
    Messages: 629

    I don't know if Pierre put it back up to 60 or not ... but, I put it at 45 until Pierre can read this and do whatever needs to be done ... put it at 30, leave it at 45, put it back to 60.. etc. etc.
  8. LSAdmin

    LSAdmin Web Developer Staff Member
    Messages: 233

    I have not touched this setting for a few months now, but I see no problem with it being at 45 seconds, and even lower if 45 seconds proves to be correct.

    Let's try it at 45 seconds, and if we see double posts appear again, we will bring it back to 60 but otherwise we may try reducing it even lower.

Share This Page