WB vs ZTR capabilities /limitations. I'd like to keep this preatty general, we know each machine is capable of extremes (going faster, slower, more power, better/worse cut... etc etc) This is strictly design type comparison, of say two alike machines For instance the WB candidate -Turf Tracer 60inch , 23hp (w/ bullrider) VS the ZTR candidate Lazer Z 60inch 27hp. I will Start the list. WB Pluses: Cheaper than a ZTR. Handles slopes better than a ZTR. (Lighter) Handles Wet conditions better than a ZTR -less rutting and tearing of grass. Outfront- better trim ability than ZTR Better visibility than a ZTR. Less chance of an injury in an emergency (easier to get off). Takes less space on the trailer. Bias: less fatigue than a ztr (me-backproblems), I use a bull-rider. Overall better for health and no belly (I guess this one is biased too) ZTR: Pluses: Faster than a WB More Available Power than a WB Easy hight adjust than a WB Added weight over a WB- Ability to use Gator-Rator. Superb clip/leaf Collection -IMO- the biggest benefit over a WB. Bias: less fatigue than a wb for those that DONT have a Bull-rider and dont have back problems I want to see additional capabilities/limitations of both machines. Reason for this post- so everyone including myself (Knowing the properties we service) will be able to avaluate what mower capabilities we need, and the limitations we are willing to accept - to better determine how to be more efficient with the right purchase decision.