Well there's the problem - the world isn't "equal" - no matter how much anyone thinks it "should" be.A note, I had everyone in our crew read this thread and all the other "employee/labor/hiring" threads. We have thorough conversations because of these threads. They do see exactly what businesses think of them. Lesser humans that deserve nothing but a cardboard box for shelter and bananna scraps for sustinence.
That is what laborers see.
They just want the world to become equal. The world has enough resources to share equitably. A fiction called "money" will never ever allow that.
Please enlighten us on what is an acceptable entry level hourly rate.A note, I had everyone in our crew read this thread and all the other "employee/labor/hiring" threads. We have thorough conversations because of these threads. They do see exactly what businesses think of them. Lesser humans that deserve nothing but a cardboard box for shelter and bananna scraps for sustinence.
That is what laborers see.
They just want the world to become equal. The world has enough resources to share equitably. A fiction called "money" will never ever allow that.
First: slaves are people who are compelled to work and who don't get paid. This thread is about voluntary workers getting paid for their time.Not every brain can become a math major and put that brain to good use, say, as an engineer, a finance job, an accountant. Every brain can not be wired or learned to become a biologist or have a physics career. Tons of people couldn't even do repetative jobs in a medical lab. It is what it is. Everybody is different.
Every industry has those. When you're young and hungry you chase the OT and every opportunity. I did, my peers did. I talk to my old coworkers and 10 years later they all say the same thing, they don't want OT, don't even want 40 hours if they can help it. They're tired and wore out, they got families now, and other obligations. It's the millennial's turn to start training the next generation of professionals. The baby boomers held out for too long in the construction industry, I noticed a drastic shift in leadership about 6 years ago when they started retiring (or being forced to retire) en masse.I have two foreman who get paid decent, $28 plus an hour with seasonal bonuses. My problem is that for the life of me I can not get them to work more than 22 hours a week. They are consistently broke, living paycheck to paycheck, when the opportunity to get ahead, even save up for a real vacation is completely available with the schedule I provide them. They just have no interest in earning more than they need to subsist off of. It totally blows my mind.
On the flipside, they do meticulous work, master craftsmen really, 20 plus years experience in masonry, carpentry, landscaping etc. I never get any call backs on their work.
So I have to ask myself, would I rather have some young buck who wants to work 40-50 hours a week, but works too fast and makes mistakes and I have to follow up on him? I have had that guy before. Or do I stay content with two meticulous workers who require no training and minimal supervision, but can only muster 22 hours a week?
I know my answer- but it sure sucks!
A note, I had everyone in our crew read this thread and all the other "employee/labor/hiring" threads. We have thorough conversations because of these threads. They do see exactly what businesses think of them. Lesser humans that deserve nothing but a cardboard box for shelter and banana scraps for sustenance.
That is what laborers see.
They just want the world to become equal. The world has enough resources to share equitably. A fiction called "money" will never ever allow that.
I'll take a strawman for $200 AlexWow... Went through this thread again and I'm still looking where something was posted about labor being less than human and us horrible business owners wanting them to live in cardboard boxes.
Edit:170M people you say, "contributing nothing"? Tell that to the dentist before your next root canal.
A reasonable amount of respect while working on the job....The laborers that do go to work are beat up and burnt out.
To get people back to work to help alleviate the pressure of the few good 'superhero' workers, what do laborers want?
I believe someone jokingly referred to them as slave bois. Someone else may have used the word yard dog.I'll take a strawman for $200 Alex![]()
My take from this thread so far is LCO pays better than other entry level jobs, and less than others. I think it's more than pay. I think people want flexible hours and be able to call out whenever they want/need to. But not lose any income doing so.
Of course that's aside from LC being seasonal and no room for growth. I did factory work, there was no room for growth there either, but they would dangle a carrot.
The share equitably thing that SAGESOVE mentioned isn't the first time I heard that. That's a concept that doesn't make any sense. I don't work this hard so other's don't have to.
Looks like like Colorado is the sweet land of honey with most positions starting at $23 an hour. Pretty sure the guys in upstate NY offering 14-15 aren't going to fill their open positions.