I do not have a professional lawn mowing service. Instead I need to buy my first ZT to mow 2.5 acres on my property plus the road frontage of my community (around 5 acres). A retired gentleman has done both up to this point, but decided it's time to take a break.
My property is not actual lawn, but 7 acres of dense forest where 2.5 acres were converted to grass areas about 15 years ago before I moved to the area. So the area to mow is bumpy with thick native grasses. I also have a hilly area with slopes around 15 degrees.
The combination road frontage is also hilly and rough. With this all the case, I think I need something more robust then entry level zero turn residential mowers.
I am a bit co fused when researching brands as it seems folks heavily push Scag. And then Ferris, Exmark, or Hustler a bit less. But at the same time, I see so many threads on this forum about Scag issues.
I was originally looking at a Gravely ZT HD or Bad Boy ZT Elite. Bot with Kawasaki engines and Hydro 3100 transmissions.
The guy that mowed my lawn d used a 4 year old Gravely ZT HD.
Do you think this grade of mower is sufficient? I am willing to spend more if needed versus spending 5-7K now and have to continually repair a mower that is not rugged enough for the job.
I was at a Bad Boy dealer and they let me drive all the models up to Rogue. I oddly came away liking the Rebel the best. Even though it has no suspension, it felt really solid. The versions with suspension felt bouncy/jittery. Dealer quoted 10,300 with 34HP Kawasaki EFI, versus 12,300 for a Rogue with 38 horsepower Kawasaki EFI. Including all taxes. He wanted 7800 for a Maverick HD.
I stopped at the local Scag dealer and they said I need a Turf Tiger 2 and quoted 15K. Unfortunately they were much less helpful and would not let me drive anything.
For some reason I am drawn to The value of BadBoy and also like Gravely Pro Turn options.
Besides great word of mouth from business owners, what are the tangible differences between many of these makers, like Scag, that use the same engines, transmissions, etc.
I live on the plateau in middle Tennessee.
My property is not actual lawn, but 7 acres of dense forest where 2.5 acres were converted to grass areas about 15 years ago before I moved to the area. So the area to mow is bumpy with thick native grasses. I also have a hilly area with slopes around 15 degrees.
The combination road frontage is also hilly and rough. With this all the case, I think I need something more robust then entry level zero turn residential mowers.
I am a bit co fused when researching brands as it seems folks heavily push Scag. And then Ferris, Exmark, or Hustler a bit less. But at the same time, I see so many threads on this forum about Scag issues.
I was originally looking at a Gravely ZT HD or Bad Boy ZT Elite. Bot with Kawasaki engines and Hydro 3100 transmissions.
The guy that mowed my lawn d used a 4 year old Gravely ZT HD.
Do you think this grade of mower is sufficient? I am willing to spend more if needed versus spending 5-7K now and have to continually repair a mower that is not rugged enough for the job.
I was at a Bad Boy dealer and they let me drive all the models up to Rogue. I oddly came away liking the Rebel the best. Even though it has no suspension, it felt really solid. The versions with suspension felt bouncy/jittery. Dealer quoted 10,300 with 34HP Kawasaki EFI, versus 12,300 for a Rogue with 38 horsepower Kawasaki EFI. Including all taxes. He wanted 7800 for a Maverick HD.
I stopped at the local Scag dealer and they said I need a Turf Tiger 2 and quoted 15K. Unfortunately they were much less helpful and would not let me drive anything.
For some reason I am drawn to The value of BadBoy and also like Gravely Pro Turn options.
Besides great word of mouth from business owners, what are the tangible differences between many of these makers, like Scag, that use the same engines, transmissions, etc.
I live on the plateau in middle Tennessee.